During the colonial period, only freemen (adult white men not working as an indentured servant) could vote. Since women and indentured servants were never allowed to vote in colonial Virginia, they were excluded but not "disfranchised."
It is possible that one or more persons of color managed to vote in the 1620's, but in the mid-1600's Virginia's colonial leaders made clear that blacks would be enslaved for their entire lifetime and slavery would be hereditary. They would not be granted the same freedoms as white indentured servants, who were allowed to vote after completing their terms of service (their "indenture").
The prohibition against voting by women, slaves, mulattoes, Native Americans, indentured servants, and those under the age of 21 were formalized in different acts of the General Assembly passed in 1699, 1705, and 1723.1
The stimulus for passing those laws may have been someone trying to violate the customs of the day, causing one or more county sheriffs to ask for official authority to block a future attempt to vote.
The first group to have the right to vote and then be disfranchised were white males living in a household with an older male. In 1655, the right to vote for members of the House of Burgesses was limited to just the heads of households.
During the Interregnum after Charles I had been executed in England, the Puritans had sent an expedition to seize Virginia from royal supporter Governor William Berkeley. After they took control of Virginia in 1652, they held an election for a new House of Burgesses. Voters were required to swear a new oath in support of Parliament rather than the king. Some royalists may have felt disfranchised, but it appears voter turnout was still high.
The legislature elected after the Puritans took control did limit the suffrage for the first time. The General Assembly decided in 1655 that only one person per family could vote in future elections, and made clear that voters had to be at least 21 years old.
As a result f the 1655 law, sons who were living with their father lost the right to participate in elections for the House of Burgesses. Young men living in homes of their older brothers, and formerly-indentured servants still living in the home of their employer, also were disfranchised.
Since all males over sixteen years of age had to pay the poll tax, the class of young males 16-20 years old experienced taxation without direct representation. They could express their concerns to the head of the house, in hopes of shaping his vote and affecting an election indirectly.
The one-vote-per-household restriction on the electorate lasted only one year. In 1656, the burgesses concluded:2
The second group to be disfranchised were white males without enough property (land or a lease for land) to be taxed.
In 1660, William Berkeley was restored to his position as governor in Virginia and Charles II was restored as king in England. In 1670, Governor Berkeley restricted the right to vote to white males who owned enough property that they were required to pay local taxes.
The governor was concerned about the growing numbers of former indentured servants who had completed their term of service, but had not acquired land to start their own farm. The governor prioritized maintaining peace with Native Americans, with whom he was engaged in a profitable fur trade. He was not willing to go to war and force the Native Americans to relinquish their land so new farms could be established in the backcountry.
Driving those Native Americans far away so the farms would not be raided might please the whites who were establishing new farms on the edge of settlement, but the governor was not willing to do that. He was willing to approve construction of new forts, which required new taxes but provided little or no military protection.
Key members of the already-wealthy gentry got paid to build the forts, and were appointed to different colonial offices that required higher taxes as well. The elite who depended upon the governor supported him as he redistributed wealth, but the poor farmers grew unruly. The new property requirement limited the ability of the unhappy farmers burdened with extra taxes to prevent the governor and General Assembly from "soaking the poor."
In England, the right to vote had long included a property requirement. For many locations, the minimum was 40 shillings. As inflation increased, more and more people qualified to vote. Different boroughs had separate requirements. In one, the judges allowed "potwallopers" to vote. A potwaller/potwalloper did not own or rent an entire house, but had enough control over one fireplace to boil the pot for themselves and their families.3
The property requirement was dropped briefly in 1676, when Governor Berkeley finally dissolved the "Long Assembly" and called an election for a new House of Burgesses. That was followed by Virginia's first civil war, Bacon's Rebellion.
After the rebellion was suppressed, royal instructions required reinstating the property requirement. The General Assembly passed such a mandate in 1684, and Virginians had to own a minimum amount of property in order to vote for the next 175 years.
A law passed in 1705 required that a man had to live in the county where he voted, but later laws simply defined a property rather than residence requirement. Relaxing the residence requirement allowed some wealthy property owners to vote in multiple jurisdictions, and to choose between them when running for the House of Burgesses.4
In 1736, the property minimums were defined as 100 acres of undeveloped land, 25 acres with a house and farmed land plantation, or a town house and lot. In 1762, the minimum ownership of undeveloped land was lowered to 50 acres and the minimum size of the town house was set at twelve feet by twelve feet (twelve feet square, or 144 square feet). Since normal town houses were at least twenty feet square, the 1762 law expanded the electorate.
The 1850 state constitution finally dropped the property ownership barrier to voting.5
The third group to be excluded were Catholics.
The Church of England was the established church in Virginia, but George Brent from Stafford County had been allowed to serve in the General Assembly after his election in 1688. After James II was overthrown in the Glorious Revolution that year, official toleration of Catholics decreased.6
In 1699, the General Assembly banned "recusant convicts" from voting. Catholics did not regain the right to vote until 1776. The Fifth Virginia Convention adopted a Declaration of Rights stating "all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion," and Virginia's first constitution made no reference to how religious status affected suffrage.7
Criminals were the fourth group of Virginians to be disfranchised as a class. When the state adopted its second constitution in 1830, people convicted of an "infamous offence" lost the right to vote. That restriction has been retained and expanded in all subsequent constitutions. The 1869 constitution gave the governor the authority to restore voting rights through a pardon.8
In 2016, Governor McAuliffe broke with precedent and issued a mass pardon for 200,000 people if they had served their time and had completed any supervised release, parole or probation requirements. A lawsuit challenging his authority to issue the pardon was quickly heard by the Virginia Supreme Court.
The judges ruled that the governor had the authority to restore voting rights, but pardons had to be processed individually. The governor then completed the process in accord with the court decision, and restored the voting rights to the 200,000 convicted criminals.9
The fifth group of Virginians to experience mass disfranchisement were white male Confederates during the Civil War.
The Union Army occupied a portion of Virginia starting with the seizure of Alexandria on May 24, 1861, and the Federal government recognized the Restored Government of Virginia based in Wheeling as the official state government. When West Virginia was admitted as a state in 1863, the Restored Government of Virginia moved to Alexandria.
In 1864, the Restored Government of Virginia approved a new constitution for the state. It required voters to take an "iron clad" oath designed to disfranchise all who had supported the Confederacy after January 1, 1864. Anyone who had served in the Confederate government or state government was also banned. The 1864 constitution did not attempt to disfranchise local officials, however.
the 1864 constitution attempted to block Confederates from voting
Source: For Virginians: Government Matters, Constitution of 1864
In March 1867, the US Congress declared Virginia to be Military District 1 and mandated that it adopt a new state constitution and allow black adult males to vote. The 1867-68 convention, presided over by John C. Underwood, proposed a new state constitution with the requirement that voters take the "iron-clad oath" swearing they were always Union supporters.
The proposed constitution would allow black men to vote, but disfranchise those white men who had held public office prior to the Civil War and then supported the Confederacy. The moral argument was that those men had broken their oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States.
The practical effect, which may have been a prime motivator for those in the 1867-68 convention who wrote the new state constitution, was to block almost all of the conservative white leadership from participating in the political process. If the top white leaders were disfranchised, then the Republicans and the newly-enfranchised blacks would be able to control the governor's office, the General Assembly, and local offices.
In 1869, a compromise was created to allow a separate vote on the suffrage restriction. Voters rejected the disfranchisement of Confederates, as proposed in the fourth clause of Article 3, Section 1:10
Article 3, Section 1 of the 1869 constitution included only three clauses, after voters rejected the proposed fourth clause to disfranchise former Confederates
Source: for Virginians: Government Matters, Constitution of Virginia, 1872
The US Congress accepted the new state constitution, which allowed previous Confederate leaders to be eligible to serve in public office.
Robert M. T. Hunter resigned from the US Senate and became Confederate Secretary of State, so the Underwood Constitution of 1869 would have blocked him from voting if the disfranchisement clause had been approved
Source: U.S. House of Representatives, Robert Mercer Taliaferro Hunter
Over the next thirty years, the General Assembly restricted the rights of black voters and limited social equality through various "Jim Crow" laws. In 1902, a new state constitution was written to limit the electorate. Carter Glass made clear the intent:11
The Supreme Court had authorized "separate but equal" treatment of the races in its 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision. The 1902 constitution was successful in treating white and black voters unequally:12
One tool of the new constitution was to reinstate the requirement that voters must have paid taxes before being eligible. Rather than require voters own a minimum amount of property, a complicated scheme for paying a poll tax was created. The Byrd Organization mastered that process to control the electorate from the 1920's into the 1960's.
Over sixty years later, the civil rights movement overturned the disfranchisement processes established in the 1902 Constitution and implemented by subsequent state laws and registration/voting procedures.
In 1964, enough states ratified the 24th Amendment to abolish the poll tax in Federal elections. That same year, the US Supreme Court ruled in Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections that the 14th Amendment blocked use of the poll tax to limit the electorate in state elections. The US Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and Virginia had to relax its racial barriers to voting.
after the Civil War, the Republican-controlled US Congress required the former Confederate states to ratify the 15th Amendment providing former male slaves the right to vote, but Virginia used the poll tax and other restrictions to limit the effectiveness of that mandate for over a century
Source: Architect of the Capitol, Lincoln's Second Inaugural, 1865