Native American Burial Sites in Virginia

Algonquian tribes on the Coastal Plain  buried the bones of chiefs in temples
Algonquian tribes on the Coastal Plain buried the bones of chiefs in temples
Source: LearnNC, Peoples of the Coastal Plain

Modern graveyards are seen as sacred spaces and eternal resting places, but the Native American dead in Virginia have not been allowed to rest in peace. With a few exceptions, their graves are unknown and unprotected from modern disturbance.

Looters seeking artifacts and amateur archeologists have scattered bones as they excavated burials. Professional archeologists have, in the past, removed skeletons and grave goods for study. The remains have been stockpiled in museums and storage vaults of government agencies. In may places across Virginia, there is little more than local lore that graves were found at a location. For example, the Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority (now NOVA Parks) once published a brochure about "Prehistoric Indians" at Potomac Overlook Regional Park that noted at the Donaldson archeologic site (44AR3):1

Two Indian burials were also reportedly found nearby by farmers in the mid-1800's.

Finding Native American graves is not easy. No Native American graves were permanently marked using granite headstones inscribed with names and dates of birth and death. Grave markers, if any were placed, have rotted or blended into the natural landscape.

All Native American cultures were disrupted and displaced from their traditional lands through the Contact Period. Memories of sacred locations were lost, or suppressed to limit intentional disturbance by colonial settlers. A few burial temples and mounds were identified by early colonists and later settlers, and nearly all were destroyed.

Calculating the number of Native American graves in Virginia requires some speculative math.

Population statistics for Native Americans since the initial occupation of Virginia are conjectural, but people have been living and dying in Virginia for perhaps 15,000-20,000 years. Adoption of agriculture 3,000 years ago increased the food supply and led to the last surge in population. The largest number of people in Virginia before arrival of the Europeans may have been after 1200CE (Common Era), after corn became the primary agricultural crop.

When the English arrived at Jamestown, there may have been 15,000 people in Tsenacomoco, the territory controlled by Powhatan. A total of 50,000 people may have been living in all of what is now Virginia, including Tsenacomoco.2

If average life expectancy (including child mortality) was 25 years, then approximately 1,000-3,000 people died each year for 300-500 years after the commitment to corn. That death rate, plus all the deaths during the Paleo-Indian, Archaic, and Early/Middle Woodland periods, could result in over 1,000,000 Native American gravesites in Virginia.

Where are they?

Customs for burying the dead must have changed over time, but human societies traditionally have placed the bones of most of the dead into the ground with some sort of ritual process. It is unlikely that the constantly-migrating hunting bands in the Paleo-Indian and Archaic periods carried a corpse far from wherever a person died. Burial sites must be scattered across the state, on whatever ridges and in whatever valleys where someone died.

It is theoretically possible that dead bodies were not buried, but left at the spot or cast into the woods/rivers. It is more likely that some of those killed during warfare and raids were left to decay on the surface of the ground. Even without a burial ceremony, the sites of battles where family members died, would have been significant in ancient times. The final resting places for those bodies would have significance in modern times too, if we knew those locations.

The number of known Native American burial sites is only a tiny percentage the total burials that occurred prior to the arrival of Europeans. All graves of the original Virginians, those who died in the Paleo-Indian periods, are lost to history. We have found stone artifacts and small pieces of charcoal from their fires, but no bones of Paleo-Indians in Virginia. In all of North America, only one grave associated with Clovis artifacts has been discovered.3

There are only a few grave sites that may date back to the Archaic Period. Since colonization started in 1607, cultural disruption of historic tribes has been equally effective in erasing knowledge of where more-recent Woodland Period gravesites are located.

With two major exceptions - burial mounds and mortuary caves - a Native American burial in Virginia will not be obvious to the casual observer, a surveyor marking parcel boundaries, or a bulldozer operator excavating flat spaces for construction.

Even less obvious will be sites with cremated remains. In Georgia, archeologists have discovered a site with seven cremated individuals who were buried more than 3,500 years ago. The practice of cremation may have been brought from the Great Lakes region, together with copper that was found with the cremains.4

Decay of human bodies in acidic soils over time has removed most physical evidence. Unique prestige goods made of long-lasting stone might have been be buried with spiritual, military, and political leaders, but hunting and gathering societies traveled light.

All crystals, spearpoints, and other items had to be carried between campsites. Hunters and gatherers in the Paleo-Indian and Archaic periods carried few prestige goods that might be placed in a grave. Within the ground, bones and organic artifacts, such as leather/fiber bags containing pearls, shells, feathers and wooden talismans, have decayed away in naturally-acidic soils.

The worldy goods of the living were limited. Even after the development of agriculture in the Woodland Period and the arrival of Europeans, Native Americans had no closets in their houses. The amount of "stuff" in Native American society was far less than is common today; there were no racks of shoes and handbags for different types of events, and no garages filled with clutter.

There were no fancy caskets either. The body or bones of a well-respected person might be wrapped in a deerskin, bear robe, or reed mat, but it appears that was not done for the common people. Graves for all who died must have been pretty simple.

In an "egalitarian" society, grave goods and mortuary practices would be would common for all. In a "ranked" society, with social stratification distinguishing elites from commoners, burials of the chiefs and priests may be distinctly different from everyone else. In the Paleo-Indian Period, the common struggle for survival may have minimized differences between leaders and followers within families, microbands, and even larger macroband gatherings. In the Archaic Period, ranked societies may have formed and burial practices may have reflected the status of the person when they died.

archeologists and anthropologists look for distinctions in burials to determine if prehistoric societies were egalitarian or stratified with separate social classes
archeologists and anthropologists look for distinctions in burials to determine if prehistoric societies were egalitarian or stratified with separate social classes
Source: Texas Beyond History, Life and Death at Mitchell Ridge

Knowledge of the location of the graves of nearly all Paleo-Indian and Archaic leaders, and of the hunters and gatherers they led, has been lost over time. The simple gravesites of hunters and gatherers do not stand out as distinctive, obvious features in the landscape.

Since the start of the Woodland Period around 3,000 years ago, people clustered together in towns for at least part of the year. Corn-intensive agriculture since 1200CE led to larger settlements, with longer periods of occupation. As those towns developed 800 years ago, the places where people lived were more concentrated. Similarly, the places where people died were more concentrated.

Though we do not have a complete understanding of pre-historic practices associated with death, it is reasonable to assume that those who died during that time of the year would have been buried nearby. There should be more graves near prehistoric Native American towns. Today, construction of any new road, house, or other modern development near a pre-historic town could disturb the remains of skeletons as well as the ceramic sherds, stone points, and postmolds still in the ground.

It was rare for archeologists to search in advance for such graves until the 1966 National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the 1970 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and the 1979 Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) required Federally-funded projects to assess potential impacts on archeological resources. Some graves were spotted in occasional "salvage archeology" projects, but protection of Native American gravesites was not a fundamental consideration before ground was disturbed for modern construction.

Once government agencies developed Cultural Resources Management programs, impacts on the buried remains of pre-historic sites were finally assessed on publicly-funded projects before construction destroyed any remaining evidence. Archeological studies for privately-funded projects remain rare, but on occasion city/county officials may require an archeological assessment as a condition of rezoning a parcel of land.

a proposal to widen I-81 triggered an assessment of archeological resources on the Norfolk Southern rail line far to the east
a proposal to widen I-81 triggered an assessment of archeological resources on the Norfolk Southern rail line far to the east
Source: Virginia Department of Transportation, "I-81 Corridor Improvement Study," Historic Properties Technical Report (Figure 1-1)

On the Coastal Plain, the bones of elite werowances and priests (and perhaps commoners) were collected after flesh decayed and then buried in ossuary mounds. John Smith visited one site with such secondary burials, the home of the Patawomeck, in 1608. Early archeological investigations there, prior to World War II, identified five ossuaries.5

John Smith saw traditional burial practices and ossuaries at Indian Point in 1608
John Smith saw traditional burial practices and ossuaries at Indian Point in 1608
Source: ESRI, ArcGIS Online

Smith reported that after death of a "king," the internal organs were removed and the body placed on elevated rails (hurdles). After the flesh rotted away or was removed by birds, the skeleton was collected, wrapped in a reed mat, and preserved in a temple with carvings to the sacred spirits (Okee):6

Their bodies are first bowelled, then dried vpon hurdles till they be very dry, and so about the most of their ioynts and necke they hang bracelets, or chaines of copper, pearle, and such like, as they vse to weare, their inwards they stuffe with copper beads, hatchets, and such trash. Then lappe they them very carefully in white skins, and so rowle them in mats for their winding sheets. And in the Tombe which is an arch made of mats, they lay them orderly. What remaineth of this kinde of wealth their Kings haue, they set at their feet in baskets. These Temples and bodies are kept by their Priests.

One key burial site was Powhatan's primary temple site, Uttamusack, in what today is King William County. The three, 60-foot long temples were destroyed in the Anglo-Powhatan wars, but the location still has meaning. Dominion Energy agreed to purchase the site in 2017 and donate Uttamusack to the Pamunkey tribe, as part of the mitigation required to get Federal approval to construct new high-voltage transmission lines across the James River at Skiffes Creek.7

The bodies of commoners may have been included in some ossuaries, but John Smith reports they were treated differently:8

For their ordinary burials, they dig a deepe hole in the earth with sharpe stakes, and the corpse being lapped in skins and mats with their iewels, they lay them vpon stickes in the ground, and so cover them with earth. The buriall ended, the women being painted all their faces with blacke cole and oyle, doe sit twenty-foure houres in the houses mourning and lamenting by turnes, with such yelling and howling, as may expresse their great passions.

Many Native American burial sites were looted in raids by the first English colonists at Jamestown. Modern archeologists have identified a few burial sites, but nearly all places where Native Americans were buried have been covered over with farms, roads, and houses. There may be undisturbed grave sites underwater, covered as sea level has risen further after the Paleo-Indians first arrived.

In Florida, an 8,000 year old site has been found where the water in the Gulf of Mexico is now 21 feet deep. The Manasota Key Offshore site, the first offshore burial discovered in North or South America, was a freshwater pond nine feet above sea level when first used for burials. That "mortuary pond" used for 1,000 years.9

A major road in Henrico County carries the name "Quioccasin," thought to be the term used to designate a temple or meeting place. In 2016 the Henrico County school board renamed "Harry F. Byrd Middle School" to "Quioccasin Middle School." Renaming the school after a Native American term had a special significance because Byrd had been a strong supporter of segregation between whites and other races, but no quioccasins have been preserved in Virginia.10

It is possible any house within any subdivision in Tidewater may have been constructed on top of a site where Native Americans were buried, but the residents will be unaware of that heritage. In at least two locations, however, housing projects led to discovery, excavation, and reburial of Native American graves.

Native American burials were identified through excavations at Great Neck
Native American burials were identified through excavations at Great Neck
Source: Virginia Department of Historic Resources, Native American Settlement at Great Neck (Figure 16)

Passage of the 1990 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) added a new layer of protection for Native American burials. Federal agencies now must to consult with Native Americans before initiating projects that might disturb archeological sites.

Federal agencies and museums also had to inventory human remains obtained from federal or tribal land, determine if a cultural affiliation could be identified with an existing tribe recognized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and offer to repatriate items. By 2016, remains of over 57,000 individuals had been identified in museums and Federal collections.11

Around the time of the passage of the 1990 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, a real estate developer near Williamsburg transformed the site of the main town of the Paspahegh into The Governor's Land at Two Rivers. The developer hired the James River Institute for Archaeology to research the site from 1988 to 1991. At times, archeologists worked just ahead of the construction equipment as they documented postholes and excavated artifacts. Graves were discovered, and 18 Native American remains with associated artifacts were reburied next to the golf course in 1993.12

In the 1970's-1980's, graves from the Chesapeake tribe were excavated as houses were built on Great Neck on Pungo Ridge, west of Broad Bay in Virginia Beach. The burials may have marked the location of the town of Chesepiooc, center of the Chesapeake tribe.

John Smith documented the Chesapeake tribe's presence in what today is Virginia Beach
John Smith documented the Chesapeake tribe's presence in what today is Virginia Beach
Source: Library of Congress, Virginia (by John Smith, 1624)

Powhatan exterminated the Chesapeake tribe about the time when the English arrived, based on a prophecy regarding threats of enemies in the east. The remains discovered during construction of the houses could have been from the "original" Chesapeakes destroyed by Powhatan. It is possible that some burials might be from the people Powatan sent to occupy the region.

No modern version of the Chesapeake Tribe exists. The Chesapeake tribe was disrupted by colonization and the first two Anglo-Powhatan wars, and they abandoned the area before 1635. In 1997, the Nansemond tribe arranged for the Virginia Department of Historic Resources to rebury the remains of 64 Native Americans at First Landing State Park.13

When the National Park Service published a Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act report of the remains, it noted:14

no relationship of shared group identity can be reasonably traced between these Native American human remains and associated funerary objects and a Federally recognized Indian tribe. However, officials of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources have determined that a relationship of shared group identity can be reasonably traced between these Native American human remains and associated funerary objects and the Nansemond Tribal Association, a non-Federally recognized Indian group.

64 members of the Chesapeake tribe were reburied at First Landing State Park in 1997
64 members of the Chesapeake tribe were reburied at First Landing State Park in 1997
64 members of the Chesapeake tribe were reburied at First Landing State Park in 1997

The chief of the Chickahominy Indians Eastern Division estimated that there were bones of 2,000 Native Americans from Virginia in the collections of the Smithsonian Institution. He proposed creating a memorial park for re-interring them, and future burials that were discovered and excavated. There would have been no distinction between tribes in the proposed memorial. The idea for a pan-tribal memorial site never moved past the idea stage. Under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, remains will be delivered to the tribe with the closest cultural affiliation.15

Until 2016, no tribe in Virginia was officially recognized, but Federal agencies may choose to consult with non-recognized groups. Researchers at Werowocomoco have been careful to invite all Virginia tribes to engage in the planning for archeological studies and future opening as a unit of the National Park Service, to invite representatives from Native American communities to visit the site, and to provide updates regarding activities and discoveries.

The Pamunkey, Chickahominy, Mattaponi, Nansemond, Rappahannock, and Upper Mattaponi formed the Virginia Indian Advisory Board for guiding activities at Werowocomoco. The board adopted a fundamental policy regarding excavations:16

The Virginia Indian community recommends that every effort should be made to avoid disturbing gravesites and human remains. If disturbed, the remains should be reburied in the same or approximate location or as close to the original location as possible without risking future disturbance.

Federal agencies also invite recognized tribes from outside the state boundaries to be consulting parties, using the Section 106 process of the National Historic Preservation Act to reach consensus on appropriate actions and mitigation. In 2017, when the US Army Corps of Engineers considered issuing a "dredge and fill" permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for The Meadows shopping center at Abingdon, it invited all three recognized Cherokee tribes - the Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians based in North Carolina, plus the Cherokee Nation and United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians based in Oklahoma.17

Burial Caves in Virginia

Burial Mounds in Virginia

Graveyards in Virginia

the Virginia Indian Advisory Board will shape what happens next, if Native American burials are uncovered at Werowocomoco
the Virginia Indian Advisory Board will shape what happens next, if Native American burials are uncovered at Werowocomoco
Source: Werowocomoco Research Project, Werowocomoco: A Powhatan Place of Power



1. "The Prehistoric Indians of Potomac Overlook Regional Park," Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority, undated brochure
2. John Salmon, "Tsenacomoco (Powhatan Paramount Chiefdom)," Encyclopedia Virginia, Virginia Foundation for the Humanities, May 30, 2014,; Spencer Tucker, James R. Arnold, Roberta Wiener, The Encyclopedia of North American Indian Wars, 1607–1890, ABC-CLIO, 2011 p.839, (last checked August 4, 2017)
3. "Oldest Burial Yields DNA Evidence of First Americans," National Geographic, February 12, 2014,; Morten Rasmussen, Sarah L. Anzick, Michael R. Waters, Pontus Skoglund, Michael DeGiorgio, Thomas W. Stafford Jr, Simon Rasmussen, Ida Moltke, Anders Albrechtsen, Shane M. Doyle, G. David Poznik, Valborg Gudmundsdottir, Rachita Yadav, Anna-Sapfo Malaspinas, Samuel Stockton White V, Morten E. Allentoft, Omar E. Cornejo, Kristiina Tambets, Anders Eriksson, Peter D. Heintzman, Monika Karmin, Thorfinn Sand Korneliussen, David J. Meltzer, Tracey L. Pierre, Jesper Stenderup, et al., "The genome of a Late Pleistocene human from aClovis burial site in western Montana," Nature, February 13, 2014, Volume 506, p.225, L3 (last checked August 29, 2017)
4. "Discovery of copper band shows Native Americans engaged in trade more extensively than thought," Archeology News Network, August 7, 2018,; Matthew C. Sanger, Mark A. Hill, Gregory D. Lattanzi, Brian D. Padgett, Clark Spencer Larsen, Brendan J. Culleton, Douglas J. Kennett, Laure Dussubieux, Matthew F. Napolitano, Sébastien Lacombe, and David Hurst Thomas, “Early metal use and crematory practices in the American Southeast,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, August 14, 2018, (last checked August 17, 2018)
5. Margaret Williamson Huber, "Religion in Early Virginia Indian Society," Encyclopedia Virginia, May 30, 2014,; Debra L. Gold, The Bioarchaeology of Virginia Burial Mounds, p.13,; T. Dale Stewart, "Archeological Exploration of Patawomeke: The Indian Town Site (44St2) Ancestral to the One (44Stl) Visited in 1608 by Captain John Smith," Smithsonian Contributions To Anthropology - Number 36, Smithsonian Institution, 1992, pp.92-93, (last checked May 17, 2017)
6. John Smith, The Generall Historie of Virginia, New-England, and the Summer Isles, 1624, p.35, (last checked May 17, 2017)
7. "Agreement clears way for Corps decision on power lines," Virginia Gazette, May 10, 2017, (last checked May 17, 2017)
8. John Smith, The Generall Historie of Virginia, New-England, and the Summer Isles, 1624, p.35, (last checked May 17, 2017)
9. "Ancient burial site off Manasota Key is 1,000 years older than estimated," Herald-Tribune, May 16, 2019, (last checked May 17, 2019)
10. "Quioccasin selected as new name for Byrd Middle School," Richmond Times-Dispatch, April 28, 2016,; "Names & Places in Henrico," Henrico County, ROAD (last checked September 2, 2016)
11. "The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)," National Park Service,; "National NAGPRA - Frequently Asked Questions," National Park Service, (last checked August 11, 2017)
12. "Homes for sale in Governors Land at Two Rivers," Deelyn Donnelly Neilson Liz Moore and Associates,; "An Introduction to the Archaeology at Governor’s Land," The History Of Governor's Land, (last checked September 6, 2017)
13. "First Landing State Park and the Last Trace of a Vanquished Nation," Abandoned Country, April 1, 2013,; "The History of the Governor's Land," Governor’s Land Foundation Heritage Committee,; "Va. Beach marker remembers area's early residents," The Virginian-Pilot, April 9, 2009, (last checked September 6, 2017)
14. "Notice of Inventory Completion for Native American Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects From the Great Neck Site, Virginia Beach, VA, in the Possession of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, Richmond, VA," National Park Service, Federal Register, Volume 62, Number 59 (March 27, 1997), (last checked September 2, 2016)
15. Elaine and Ray Adkins, Chickahominy Indians-Eastern Division: A Brief Ethnohistory, Xlibris Corporation, 2007, p.102, (last checked September 2, 2016)
16. "Virginia Indian Advisory Board," Werowocomoco Research Project,; "Policy Statements," Werowocomoco Research Project, (last checked August 11, 2017)
17. "US Army Corps looking to the public to offer insight on The Meadows," Bristol Herald Courier, August 9, 2017, (last checked August 11, 2017)

"Indians" of Virginia - The Real First Families of Virginia
Virginia Places