Burial Mounds in Virginia

Ely Mound in Lee County
Ely Mound in Lee County
Source: Wikipedia, Ely Mound

The most obvious examples of easily-recognized Native American gravesites are the large earthen mounds constructed west of the Blue Ridge from Southwestern Virginia (including Ely Mound and Carter Robinson Mound in Lee County) through the Shenandoah Valley. There are 13 documented mound complexes in Virginia. Of that number, seven were made from just earth and six were made with a combination of earth and stones.

The Virginia mounds were built originally between 900 CE-1440 CE (Common Era). Because the upper portions of the mounds have been removed, it is not possible to date their last use. They could have been used as recently as the 1700's.

Three were built east of the Blue Ridge. The Rivanna (Jefferson) Mound is in the headwaters of the Rivanna River, and the Rapidan Mound is 14 miles to the north in the headwaters of the Rapidan River. The Leesville Mound is on the Roanoke River near modern Altavista. Further east Native Americans created ossuaries, collecting bones of the dead and stockpiling them in secondary burials.

The Piedmont mounds are thought to be the most recent. They have a lower percentage of bones from infants and juveniles, compared to the mounds west of the Blue Ridge. Cultural practices may have changed over time. In the older mounds, everyone who died with a certain time period may have been placed in a layer of bones and earth added to the mound. In the Piedmont mounds, it appears few infants and juveniles were excavated and reinterred with the adults when a mound was expanded.

It appears that all the mounds were constructed not only as burial sites, but also as ceremonial centers. Postholes indicate structures were associated with the mounds, and presumably used for rituals. At the Rapidan Mound, archeologists found nails in the top layers, indicating that during the colonial period settlers also built structures on top of the mound.1

The mounds in Virginia are associated with the Mississippian culture that developed during the Woodland Period around 1000CE (Common Era), but the practice of building earthworks in North America is much older.

The earliest artificial earthworks in North America were built in Louisiana. Two of the oldest structures on earth are located on the Louisiana State University campus in Baton Rouge. Construction of "Mound B" began about 11,000 years ago (9,000 BCE), near the end of the Paleo-Indian Period. Construction stopped around 8,200 years ago during an abrupt period of cooling climate. About 7,500 years ago, construction began of nearby "Mound A" and restartd at "Mound B." Both were completed around 6,000 years ago (4,000 BCE).

Other mounds also were built in what is now Louisiana during the Archaic Period. Over decades or even centuries, visitors to Watson Brake (3,400 BCE), Poverty Point (1,600 BCE), and other early mounds built several thousands of years ago gradually expanded the structures, hauling baskets of dirt to build crescents of raised land. The motivation to build the mounds is not known, but they may have been created to provide an elevated platform at regular gatherings for trade and intermarriage. Archeologists have recovered ash and bone fragments, indicating the mounds were used for ceremonial purposes but not burials.

the oldest known human-made structures in North America are on the grounds of Louisiana State University
the oldest known human-made structures in North America are on the grounds of Louisiana State University
Source: Louisiana State University, New Research Shows LSU Campus Mounds As The Oldest Known Man-Made Structures In North America

The ancient mounds in Louisiana were constructed before the development of agriculture. The particular Louisiana sites may have been chosen because wetlands nearby could feed a large hunting/gathering group during brief visits. Construction may have involved just several days of labor each season, in a time before permanent towns were established, within a society that could organize large construction projects. Watson Brake and Poverty Point were not built on a random whim. The investment of labor to pile up the dirt demonstrates that the mounds had some sort of meaning, but archeological investigations have not shown a clear association with burials.

The first mounds may have been started initially to mark the location of sites where festivals could be held, since the area provided enough food for a temporary gathering. Location of the initial mounds may have been determined by something not obvious today. Perhaps one influential leader had a vision at Watson Brake or Poverty Point, and was able to organize enough followers to make that spot as a spiritual center by raising a mound. The initial structure might have been produced in just several days by a few dozen people, then expanded gradually in continual short visits.

One researcher at Poverty Point has noted:2

One of the most remarkable things is that these earthworks have held together for more than 3,000 years with no failure or major erosion. By comparison, modern bridges, highways and dams fail with amazing regularity because building things out of dirt is more complicated than you would think. They really were incredible engineers with very sophisticated technical knowledge.

Poverty Point earthworks were engineered so well that they have resisted 3,600 years of erosion
Poverty Point earthworks were engineered so well that they have resisted 3,600 years of erosion
Poverty Point earthworks were engineered so well that they have resisted 3,600 years of erosion
Source: Wikipedia, Poverty Point

Complex societies developed around 1,000CE in the Ohio River and Mississippi River valleys, after adoption of corn expanded the food supply and population increased. Egalitarian hunting/gathering bands were replaced by stratified, sedentary societies. Most mounds appear to have been built after adoption of agriculture, which provided a reliable supply of food for the workers who piled up the dirt.

When Native American bands relied upon hunting and gathering, leaders of a hunt and decisionmakers on where to gather food probably were chosen based on merit. Those men and women who had demonstrated success in previous food gathering directed the next effort. Short lifespans required regular changes in leadership, and constant movement to collect food limited the ability to acquire bulky prestige goods.

When Native American societies began to rely upon agriculture and establish permanent settlements, the pattern changed. An increase in the food supply led to an increase of inequality. In the Mississippian Period, elite spiritual, political, and military leaders acquired special status. Economic wealth and authority were concentrated within the leadership, creating stratified societies with a "1%" category. Somehow, perhaps by articulating spiritual beliefs and manipulating religious practices, the elite were able to get a large number of workers to carry baskets of dirt and construct mounds as much as 100' high.

Earthen mounds were built by accretion, through hard work without labor-saving animals or equipment. The first component was often a structure with wooden posts, and sometimes with slabs of stone. Elite leaders were buried within the structure, then dirt was piled on top and on the sides. On top of the platform, new structures served as meeting places.

The mound construction process used the same technology and techniques for 5,000 years, from creation of the original mounds in Louisiana to the final mounds built around 1700 CE. The construction of the mounds, as described by one anthropologist, required no sophisticated tools:3

The Poverty Point mounds were built by people who had no access to domesticated draft animals, no wheelbarrows, no sophisticated tools for moving earth...

It's likely that these mounds were built using a simple "bucket brigade" system, with thousands of people passing soil along from one to another using some form of crude container, such as a woven basket, a hide sack or a wooden platter.

earthworks at Poverty Point included six rows of concentric ridges, some five feet high
earthworks at Poverty Point included six rows of concentric ridges, some five feet high
Source: Louisiana Public Broadcasting, Poverty Point Earthworks: Evolutionary Milestones of the Americas

After initial construction of a low mound, people often were buried on the sides and a new layer of earth added to expand the width of a mound. The structures on top could be burned in a ritual ceremony, or repurposed as another tomb covered with dirt, to increase the height with new layer of earths carried to the top of the old mound.

There is no historical documentation of the Mississippian culture and the people who build the mounds. What we know today is discerned through archeological investigation. When colonists first entered the Ohio River and Mississippi River valleys, the Native Americans were using mounds that had been completed by earlier cultures.

Structures on the top are thought to have included housing for the elite, meeting places and feast sites for larger groups, sweat lodges for ritual cleansings, and temples for bones of the dead. Enlarging a mound added space for more burials, and the increased size made the site more impressive.

Leesville Mound is downstream of Smith Mountain Gap, a clearly-recognizable landscape feature
Leesville Mound is downstream of Smith Mountain Gap, a clearly-recognizable landscape feature
Source: ESRI, ArcGIS Online

Mounds were started where there was already bodies, typically buried in a pit. Burials in a Virginia mound were not a one-time event; they continued for centuries. Some were primary, but others were secondary burials where bones were dug up from another site and transferred and reburied in the mound with some sort of ritual. In the earth-stone mounds, rocks were placed on top of the burials.

Adding the dead to an existing mound and building a new set of structures on a larger platform, rather than building a new mound, affirmed continuity with the past. Power and authority associated with the dead was transferred to the next generation, using the expanded mound as part of an ancestor cult. In some cases, such as Mound 72 at Cahokia (Illinois), people were sacrificed and buried in mounds.

Burials did not occur in random one-time events, as people died. Instead, burials and mound expansion occurred in cycles, probably as an event involving a population of over 300 people living in separate towns. Bones of multiple individuals who had been buried elsewhere were gathered from one or more other locations and interred as a group, perhaps annually or once every three years. A ritual:4

...was performed periodically when, at certain intervals, the defleshed remains of the dead were gathered up, brought to a common burial location, mixed and joined together on the surface of the mound, covered with soil, and left.

Mounds built on natural high spots in the local topography provided a rare opportunity to see great distances, even over the tops of trees. Perhaps equally important, the mounds could be seen from long distances, and may have marked boundaries or the center of territory controlled by a particular set of families that evolved into clan and tribal leaders.

One mound complex is on the South Branch of the Shenandoah River, where the highly-valued jasper and flint were excavated for over 10,000 years at the Thunderbird site. The nomination form for the National Register of Historic Places notes:5

In the Flint Run Archeological District, there are at least 12 mounds... Constructed largely of Pleistocene river gravels, they are often referred to as stone mounds. The mounds always occur in groups of two or three located at the point of a headland which is bordered by ravines on either side. All are located within the shale zone.

Mounds may have been associated with kin groups, and people buried in a mound may have been related to each other. As different kin groups established greater authority and became the source of chiefs in different tribes, mound burial may have become a "perk" restricted to the families of the powerful.

The distinctive mounds became the most obvious Native American gravesites in Virginia. People were also buried away from the mound, but archeological research and preservation efforts focus on the obvious structures. There may be far more individual burials, away from the mounds, than the few Native American skeletons found so far. Assuming Virginia was occupied for roughly 15,000 years before colonization, there are many unidentified burial sites. Modern development - houses, roads, shopping centers near floodplains that were once Native American corn fields - has occurred on top of many unidentified Native American gravesites.6

Trade and migration along the Kanawha and Tennessee rivers brought the Mississippian culture into Southwest Virginia. Immigrants with a different culture, and perhaps a different language, walked from the Norris Basin in Tennessee up the Powell River to Indian Creek, in what is now Lee County. The migrants grew no corn, so their base may have been primarily a trading station for shells and salt.

The new arrivals may have constructed Ely Mound first, then moved about 6 miles south. We know immigrants associated with Mississippian culture had arrived between 1250 to 1400CE, because they built what is known now as the Carter Robinson Mound (44LE10) in the Powell River watershed.

The mound was constructed in two-three major episodes early in the occupation of the site. The site was occupied for a century, during which the occupants adopted some of the Radford pottery style (with limestone temper) used by the neighbors. Of the four structures identified by archeologists at the Carter Robinson Mound, one showed evidence of shell bead crafting but lacked evidence of domestic occupation. It may have been the center of trading activity.

The trading station evolved into a production center where cannel coal was carved into artifacts for exchange. Later, trading connections with Saltville included creation of kinship relationships through exchange of women. That enabled those living at Carter Robinson to start salt production for trade.

Saline waters were boiled in pottery bowls shaped for that purpose, evaporating the liquid so salt crystals could be scraped from the pan. The salt was exchanged for shells from the Atlantic Coast, which were carved into gorgets and traded further inland. Women may have been in charge of the trading network, which layer shifted from Saltville to Western Carolina Pisgah groups.7

The Carter Robinson mound and village site was occupied during the 13th and 14th centuries by a group of Native Americans who had moved there from nearby Tennessee. These Mississippian cultural period natives moved to this area to take advantage of an ongoing trade in salt and shell by the non-Mississippian Radford cultural period groups in southwestern Virginia. The inhabitants of the Carter Robinson site settled, began constructing houses, and within about 50 years had constructed a mound and at least 10 houses.

">archeologists excavating at Carter Robinson Mound in Lee County, near Cumberland Gap
archeologists excavating at Carter Robinson Mound in Lee County, near Cumberland Gap
Source: Facebook, Carter Robinson Mound Site

Similar immigrants with a key common cultural characteristic (construction of burial mounds) arrived further north in Virginia, or perhaps local residents changed their habits and adopted elements of the Mississippian culture. Multiple mounds were constructed on floodplains within the Seven Bends of the Shenandoah River, but have been flattened by farming since the 1700's.

West of the Blue Ridge in the watersheds of the James and Shenandoah rivers, mounds as high as 20 feet contained many more human remains than mounds in the Tennessee River Valley. In Virginia places occupied by the Earthen Mound Burial Culture after 950CE:8

...mounds were distinct from the Mississippian mounds [west of the Alleghenies] in that they served as the final burial place for hundreds, and, in some cases, thousands of people.

The Mississippian culture thrived in the Ohio River Valley until around 1400CE. The mounds in Virginia may have been constructed a century before Columbus "discovered" America. The people who built the mounds then morphed into new cultures, the tribes of the historical period encountered by early explorers and settlers in western Virginia in the 1600's and 1700's. Those new tribes could have continued to expand or at least venerate the mounds into the time of the American Revolution.

Radiocarbon dates show that the 13 burial mounds in Virginia were started between 900 CE-1440 CE. Burials may have been added to some mounds into the mid-1600's, and their presence was remembered even after burials stopped. Thomas Jefferson reported that as a child, he saw a group of Native Americans go six miles out of their way to visit a mound near Charlottesville on the Rivanna River. He also identified the location of one near modern-day Waynesboro:9

...in the low grounds of the South branch of Shenandoah, where it is crossed by the road leading from the Rockfish gap to Staunton.

Jefferson recognized that the most obvious reminder of the original inhabitants of Virginia were those mounds:10

...many are to be found all over this country. These are of different sizes, some of them constructed of earth, and some of loose stones. That they were repositories of the dead, has been obvious to all but on what particular occasion constructed, was a matter of doubt.

Some have thought they covered the bones of those who have fallen in battles fought on the spot of interment. Some ascribed them to the custom, said to prevail among the Indians, of collecting, at certain periods the bones of all their dead, wheresoever deposited at the time of death.

Others again supposed them the general sepulchres for towns, conjectured to have been on or near these grounds; and this opinion was supported by the quality of the lands in which they are found, (those constructed of earth being generally in the softest and most fertile meadow grounds on river sides) and by a tradition, said to be handed down from the aboriginal Indians, that, when they settled in a town, the first person who died was placed erect, and earth put about him, so as to cover and support him ; that when another died, a narrow passage was dug to the first, the second reclined against him, and the cover of earth replaced, and so on...

A curious Thomas Jefferson conducted the first American scientific archaeological study of a Monacan mound on the Rivanna River. That excavation established his reputation today as the faher of American archeology. As one scholar noted:11

This type of excavation is the first of its kind, and several aspects of this investigation made it unique for the period. First, Jefferson had specific questions in regards to burial practices of the Indians that the excavation was tailored to answer - rather than simply mining artifacts as was custom. Second, he excavated to answer the question of mound function in regards to burial which was unheard of during this time. Third, he utilized trench and stratigraphic techniques which pre-dated "modern" excavation methodologies by a century...

Jefferson's report of the mound included:12

It was of a spheroidical form, of about 40 feet diameter at the base, and had been of about twelve feet altitude, though now reduced by the plough to seven and a half, having been under cultivation about a dozen years. Before this it was covered with trees of twelve inches diameter, and round the base was an excavation of five feet depth and width, from whence the earth had been taken of which the hillock was formed...

Monasukapanough, the main Monacan town, was located across the South Fork of the Rivanna River from the mound that Thomas Jefferson excavated (exact location of the mound is unknown)
Monasukapanough, the main Monacan town, was located across the South Fork of the Rivanna River from the mound that Thomas Jefferson excavated (exact location of the mound is unknown)
Source: ESRI, ArcGIS Online

He discovered that the bones were placed at different layers in the mound, proving it was built in stages. Bones were not the remains of intact bodies buried in the mound. Instead, they had been brought to the mound after flesh had been removed or decayed away. Some skulls had been used as containers to hold small bones.

Jefferson estimated that the Rivanna Mound included the remains of 1,000 people. He recognized with insight that he did not find smashed skulls and broken bones of warriors killed in battle. He concluded from the absence of trauma on the bones that the mound was not a battlefield cemetery, but instead was the "common sepulchre of a town."13

Jefferson also reported that there was a mound north of Woods Gap in the Blue Ridge that was:14

made up of small stones thrown together. This has been opened and found to contain human bones, as the others do.

in addition to mounds that were removed for farming or construction, others were destroyed by people seeking artifacts rather than information
in addition to mounds that were removed for farming or construction, others were destroyed by people seeking artifacts rather than information
Source: Judith H. Dobrzynski, A Wider View of Grandeur: Restoring an American Treasure

The earth mounds were disturbed by early settlers, and most were flattened for farming. Jefferson also commented regarding two mounds near his home:15

Both these have within these dozen years, been cleared of their trees, and put under cultivation, are much reduced in their heighth, and spread in width, by the plough, and will probably disappear in time.

In 1911, David I. Bushnell, Jr. excavated the site on the Rivanna River. He reported that the mound, known locally as "The Indian Grave," had entirely disappeared by then. Repeated plowing at the site had helped to flatten it, but a major flood 40 years earlier had eroded the top two feet. He found no skeleton parts, and no other evidence of burials. He did record local lore that in the 1700's Native American groups visited not only the Rivanna Mound, but also two other mounds across the Blue Ridge in the Shenandoah Valley.16

The Leesville Mound was largely destroyed by young boys excavating soapstone pipes and other artifacts to sell to a collector. When the collector realized what was happening, he conducted his own dig and found human remains:17

There were five burial layers. The bones showed a progressive deterioration from top to bottom. I did not find a complete or well preserved skeleton. The bones I did find were crowded together as though thrown in after the flesh had left the bones. These bones deteriorated almost immediately upon contact with the air.

Interlarded throughout were slabs of heavy rock. It looked as though the mound had been built up by a series of burials over a period of years, beginning at ground level...

Leesville Mound had five burial layers
Leesville Mound had five burial layers
Source: Archeological Society of Virginia Quarterly Bulletin, The Leesville Mound (December 1952, Figure 1)

The Rapidan Mound was once 15 feet high. John Smith recorded the town of Stegara on his map, where the mound was located. By the end of the 1800's, half of the mound had been eroded away by the Rapidan River, the center had been quarried, earth had been removed to enrich nearby fields, and layers of bone had been disturbed by looters. Today, the small remaining portion of Rapidan Mound is just six feet high.

Scientific excavation by University of Virginia archeologists in 1988-1990 removed human skeletal remains associated with at least 60 individuals. Archeologists mapped both "bone beds" of secondary reburials within the mound and pit burials below the base of the mound. The 9,000 bones were reburied by the Monacan tribe in 1998.

The archeologists estimated that remains of 1,000-2,000 people had been buried over time in the Rapidan Mound, making it the largest Native American burial site in Virginia. The presence of just one mound in the Rapidan watershed and one mound in the James River watershed suggests they defined the territory of the Manahoac and Monacan nations. The Leesville Mound on the Roanoke River may identify territory of the Totero or another Siouan-speaking group.18

the Rapidan Mound was constructed next to the town of Stegara in territory of the Manahoack, and the Rivannna (Jefferson) Mound was at Monasukapanough in Monacan territory
the Rapidan Mound was constructed next to the town of Stegara in territory of the Manahoack, and the Rivannna (Jefferson) Mound was at Monasukapanough in Monacan territory
Source: Library of Congress, Virginia (by John Smith, 1624)

A mound in Loudoun County, at the corner of Route 15 and Foxfield Lane south of Leesburg, has been reported to be a burial site. It is located on the grounds of what was once the Greenway farm, which developed after a land grant from Lord Fairfax in the 1700's.

According to local lore, Catawba warriors ambushed a band of Delaware (Lenape) near the Potomac River, or perhaps near the confluence of Goose Creek and Little River. The Delaware were returning from a raid into the Carolina Piedmont, when the Catwaba surprised them and killed many. The bodies were supposedly buried in a mound, and Native Americans continued to visit the site until recently.19

It is reasonable to assume a fight could occur near Leesburg among rival tribes. The path at the base of the Blue Ridge, roughly Route 15 today, was used for raids in the 1600's by both southern and northern tribes until the Iroquois signed away their right to use it in 1722 Treaty of Albany.

It is highly unlikely that the mound is associated with the Mississippian moundbuilding culture. It is also unlikely that a raiding party of Delaware in the 1700's would have created a mound for a burial site. Piling up dead bodies above the surface and adding dirt to create a visible mound is not a Delaware tradition. The one report of Delaware buried in a mound, written a century ago, probably reflects the topography of a burial on a hillside.20

a supposed burial mound of Delawares is in Loudoun County
a supposed burial mound of Delawares is in Loudoun County
Source: ESRI, ArcGIS Online

Another site in western Prince William County, the hill east of Buckland known as Cerro Gordo, is also reported by oral tradition to be a Cherokee dancing ground or "step mound." That tradition is based upon a 2009 phone interview with Chief Eagle, who was living in Canada and was 84 years old at the time. He had visited the site in 1955 to establish the claim that the Cherokee had lived far beyond western North Carolina before removal in 1817-1839.

An existing mound at Cerro Gordo, dating back as much as 4,000 years, was supposedly adopted for use by the Cherokee for dancing and cleansing water ceremonies.

Chief Eagle said he was led by local residents with Native American ancestry to three round depressions, four-five feet deep, which may have been the sites of earth lodges. Those local residents reported that other smaller mounds were once located nearby. Two were located when Chief Eagle visited in 1955, but perhaps 20 others had disappeared by that time. There is speculation that the smaller mounds were used for burials, but no archeological sites have been identified in Prince William County with Native American burials.

A modern story about the 2009 phone call says:21

Chief Eagle described the mounds they found as round in shape, measuring from 25 to 30 feet across, and between ten and twelve feet high. It is likely that the step mound had an arbor or other decorations on the top that were used in the ceremonies held there.

Cerro Gordo, a hill in western Prince William County, has been reported to be the site of a step mound used by the Cherokee for dancing
Cerro Gordo, a hill in western Prince William County, has been reported to be the site of a "step mound" used by the Cherokee for dancing
Source: US Geological Survey (USGS), The National Map

It is likely that the Cherokee visited the site of Buckland often in the 1600's. They would have traveled north along a well-used trail on the eastern edge of the Blue Ridge, together with the Catawba from the Piedmont of what is now North Carolina, to trade with northern tribes and especially to raid the Iroquois. Their raiding expeditions, and return trips by the Iroquois to attack the southern tribes, displaced the Manahoacs who John Smith reported wer living in the area when he visited the mouth of the Occoquan River in 1619.

Step mounds were used by the Cheokee for dancing during the Green Corn Ceremony. Most Cherokee raids against the Iroquois occurred in the Fall, after the harvest of corn was completed and the brush had died back to clear the trails. Perhaps the natural hill at Cerro Gordo was used as a "step mound" for a ceremonial dance not associated with the Green Corn Cermony, or perhaps a Cherokee raid left so early in summer that the first harvest of green corn was being celebrated.

Either way, it is highly unlikely that a new mound would have been created by the Cherokee at Cerro Gordo between the late 1600's and the 1722 Treaty of Albany, in which the Iroquois abandoned their right to travel along the eastern edge of the Blue Ridge. If the Manahoacs, or earlier residents who shared the Moundbuilder tradition, had left behind an ancient mound of some sort, the only evidence today is the memory of a 1955 site visit documented in a 2009 telephone conversation.

Multiple reports of Native American mounds on Virginia's Coastal Plain have been investigated by archeologists. In no case has a mound been authenticated as a prehistoric or even historic site used by Native Americans for ceremonies or burials. Historical records from the early colonial period do not include references of Algonquian-speaking tribal groups on the Coastal Plain constructing any temples on top of raised platforms.

Coastal Plain mounds have been identified as either natural erosional features or associated with construction projects. A mound on the Pamunkey Reservation, reportedly the burial site of Powhatan or Opechancanough, is more likely the residue from completion of the Richmond and York River Railroad in 1861.

Two possible burial mounds near Manquin in King William County were investigated in 1983. One mound was 75 feet in diameter and 10 feet in height; the other was roughly 100 feet in diameter and 15 feet in height. Human bones apparently were found 40 years earlier at the larger mound, and they were nar Opechancanough's settlement of Menmend.

Flakes from manufacturing stone tools were found on both mounds, but the two mounds turned out to be natural features. The lithic residue was probably created when Native Americans hunting in the bottomlands of the Pamunkey River stopped on the mounds and sharpened their stone tools.22

Burial Caves in Virginia

Graveyards in Virginia

Native American Burial Sites in Virginia

Salt in Virginia

two reported burial mounds near Manquin turned out to be natural erosional features
two reported burial mounds near Manquin turned out to be natural erosional features
Source: US Geological Survey (USGS), King William VA 1:62,500 topographic quadrangle (1920)

Links

one of the burial mounds in the Shenandoah Valley is remembered today by Indian Mound Road, crossing Lewis Creek in Augusta County
one of the burial mounds in the Shenandoah Valley is remembered today by Indian Mound Road, crossing Lewis Creek in Augusta County
Source: Library of Congress, Map of Augusta County, Virginia (Jedediah Hotchkiss, 1870)

References

1. Gary Dunham, Debra Gold, Jeffrey Hantman, "Collective Burial in Late Prehistoric Virginia: Excavation and Analysis of the Rapidan Mound," American Antiquity, Volume 68, Number 1 (January, 2003), p.110, p.118, p.121, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3557035; Jeffrey L. Hantman, Debra L. Gold and Gary H. Dunham, "Of Parsimony and Archaeological Histories: A Response to Comment by Boyd," American Antiquity, Volume 69, Number 3 (July, 2004), https://www.jstor.org/stable/4128408 (last checked June 27, 2019)
2. Joe W. Saunders, Rolfe D. Mandel, C. Garth Sampson, Charles M. Allen, E.Thurman Allen, Daniel A. Bush, James K. Feathers, Kristen J. Gremillion, C. T. Hallmark,H. Edwin Jackson, Jay K. Johnson, Reca Jones, Roger T. Saucier, Gary L. Stringer, Malcolm F. Vidrine, "Watson Brake, a Middle Archaic Mound Complex in Northeast Louisiana," American Antiquity, Volume 70 Number 4 (October, 2005), pp.662-663, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40035868; George R. Milner, The Moundbuilders: Ancient People of Eastern North America, Thames & Hudson, 2004, pp.48-49, p.93, p.108, https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Moundbuilders.html?id=-5VZHAAACAAJ; "New evidence supports idea that America's first civilization was made up of 'sophisticated' engineers," Washington University in St. Louis, September 1, 2021, https://source.wustl.edu/2021/09/new-evidence-supports-idea-that-americas-first-civilization-was-made-up-of-sophisticated-engineers/; "New Research Shows LSU Campus Mounds As The Oldest Known Man-Made Structures In North America," Louisiana State University, August 19, 2022, https://www.lsu.edu/mediacenter/news/2022/08/19gg_ellwood_lsucampusmounds.php (last checked August 23, 2022)
3. "Archaic Native Americans built massive Louisiana mound in less than 90 days, research confirms," Heritage Daily, January, 2013, http://www.heritagedaily.com/2013/01/archaic-native-americans-built-massive-louisiana-mound-in-less-than-90-days-research-confirms/74397 (last checked August 1, 2021)
4. George R. Milner, The Moundbuilders: Ancient People of Eastern North America, Thames & Hudson, 2004, pp.125-126, p.129, p.133, https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Moundbuilders.html?id=-5VZHAAACAAJ; Gary Dunham, Debra Gold, Jeffrey Hantman, "Collective Burial in Late Prehistoric Virginia: Excavation and Analysis of the Rapidan Mound," American Antiquity, Volume 68, Number 1 (January, 2003), pp.112-114, pp.122-124, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3557035 (last checked June 12, 2019)
5. George R. Milner, The Moundbuilders: Ancient People of Eastern North America, Thames & Hudson, 2004, p.95, https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Moundbuilders.html?id=-5VZHAAACAAJ; "093-0165 Flint Run Archaeological District (Thunderbird Archaeological District)," Virginia DEpartment of Historic REsources, 1975, https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/historic-registers/093-0165/ (last checked March 20, 2021)
6. "The Moundbuilders," Ancient Architects of the Mississippi, National Park Service, https://www.nps.gov/archeology/feature/builder.htm; George R. Milner, The Moundbuilders: Ancient People of Eastern North America, Thames & Hudson, 2004, p.58, p.70, p.120, https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Moundbuilders.html?id=-5VZHAAACAAJ (last checked August 1, 2017)
7. Maureen Meyers, "Excavating a Mississippian Frontier: Fieldwork at the Carter Robinson Mound Site," Native South, Volume 1, 2008, p.29, p.32, https://doi.org/10.1353/nso.0.0007; "Sneak Peak: Covering the Mississippian Frontier at Carter Robinson," The Archeological Conservancy, August 1, 2017, https://www.archaeologicalconservancy.org/sneak-peak-covering-the-carter-robinson-dig/; Maureen Meyers, "Political Economy of Exotic Trade on the Mississippian Frontier: A Case Study of a Fourteenth Century Chiefdom in Southwestern Virginia," PhD dissertation, University of Kentucky, 2011, p.3, pp.7-8, pp.318-322, p.325, p.332, p.335, https://www.academia.edu/10147663/Political_Economy_of_Exotic_Trade_on_the_Mississippian_Frontier_A_Case_Study_of_a_Fourteenth_Century_Chiefdom_in_Southwestern_Virginia; Hannah Watterston, Joel Lennen, Maureen Meyers, Cameron Wesson, "Mound and Village, Landscape & Identity," poster at Southeastern Archaeological Conference, 2013, https://www.academia.edu/10147076/Mound_and_Village_Landscape_and_Identity (last checked July 8, 2022)
8. Keith Egloff, Deborah Woodward, "First People: The Early Indians of Virginia," Virginia Department of Historic Resources, September 2006, https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/first-people-the-early-indians-of-virginia/late-woodland-a-d-900-1600/; "Seven Bends of the Shenandoah River," Encyclopedia Virginia, Virginia Foundation for the Humanities, https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/media_player?mets_filename=evr11531mets.xml (last checked June 11, 2019)
9. Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, Boston, Lilly and Wait, 1832, p.103, p.106, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008584184; Gary Dunham, Debra Gold, Jeffrey Hantman, "Collective Burial in Late Prehistoric Virginia: Excavation and Analysis of the Rapidan Mound," American Antiquity, Volume 68, Number 1 (January, 2003), p.112, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3557035 (last checked June 12, 2019)
10. Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the state of Virginia, Boston, Lilly and Wait, 1832, p.100, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008584184 (last checked July 30, 2017)
11. Michael Fedorof, "The Power of Archaeology in the Construction and Formation of National Identity: Early Americanist Archaeology (Pre-1850)," Academia Letters, 2021, p.2, https://www.academia.edu/79461608/The_Power_of_Archaeology_in_the_Construction_and_Formation_of_National_Identity_Early_Americanist_Archaeology_Pre_1850_ (last checked December 23, 2022)
12. Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, Boston, Lilly and Wait, 1832, p.100, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008584184; J. Hantman, "Jefferson's Mound Archaeological Site," Encyclopedia Virginia, July 1, 2014, http://www.EncyclopediaVirginia.org/Jefferson_s_Mound_Archaeological_Site; "Jefferson's Excavation of an Indian Burial Mound," Monticello, https://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/jeffersons-excavation-indian-burial-mound (last checked July 30, 2017)
13. George R. Milner, The Moundbuilders: Ancient People of Eastern North America, Thames & Hudson, 2004, p.179, https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Moundbuilders.html?id=-5VZHAAACAAJ; Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, Boston, Lilly and Wait, 1832, p.102, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008584184 (last checked August 1, 2017)
14. Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, Boston, Lilly and Wait, 1832, p.103, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008584184 (last checked July 30, 2017)
15. Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, Boston, Lilly and Wait, 1832, p.103, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008584184 (last checked July 30, 2017)
16. David I. Bushnell, Jr., The William and Mary Quarterly, Volume 23, Number 2 (October, 1914), pp.109-112, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1915110 (last checked June 14, 2019)
17. Sam L. Davenport, Joseph R. Judge, "The Leesville Mound," Quarterly Bulletin, Archeological Society of Virginia, Volume 7, Number 2 (December 1952), pp.2-4
18. Gary Dunham, Debra Gold, Jeffrey Hantman, "Collective Burial in Late Prehistoric Virginia: Excavation and Analysis of the Rapidan Mound," American Antiquity, Volume 68, Number 1 (January, 2003), pp.114-115, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3557035 (last checked June 12, 2019)
19. Gene Scheel, "Indian Mounds of Loudoun County," The History of Loudoun County Virginia, https://www.loudounhistory.org/history/indian-mounds-loudoun/; "Unearthing Mystery of Indian Mound," Washington Post, September 5, 2004, https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/2004/09/05/unearthing-mystery-of-indian-mound/be88d639-d631-4553-af99-540fcfc57983/ (last checked June 13, 2019)
20. R. Dustin Cushman, "The Context of Death: Burial Rituals in the Delaware Valley," Archaeology of Eastern North America, Volume 35 (2007), https://www.jstor.org/stable/40914518 (last checked June 13, 2019)
21. "Archaeological Testing and Survey of the Buckland Mills and Distillery Properties - Prince William County, Virginia," Volume 1, James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc.. July 2011, p.15, http://bucklandva.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/archaeo-survey_JRIA-Buckland-final-report-Volume-I-7-22-11.pdf; "Cerro Gordo at Buckland," Broad Run Lifestyle Magazine, April 2016, https://bucklandva.net/history/19th-century/cerro-gordo/; "Stomp Dance," The Cherokee Registry, https://cherokeeregistry.com/stomp-dance/ (last checked August 20, 2022)
22. E. Randolph Turner, Herbert G. Fisher, "The Search For Elusive Virginia Coastal Plain Burial Mounds: An Example From King William County," Quarterly Bulletin, Archeological Society of Virginia, Volume 39, Number 4 (December 1984), http://www.pampatike.org/PDFs/THE%20SEARCH%20FOR%20ELUSIVE%20VIRGINIA%20COASTAL%20PLAIN%20BURIAL%20MOUNDS.pdf (last checked November 15, 2023)


Population of Virginia
"Indians" of Virginia - The Real First Families of Virginia
Virginia Places