possible migration paths to Virginia from Asia or even Europe
Source: base map from Wikipedia
The first people to occupy Virginia, known as Paleo-Indians, came here from elsewhere. Where they came from, and how they got here, is still a matter of dispute.
The first humans to occupy North American may have walked here from Siberia, crossing the Bering land bridge as they hunted for game and gathered plant foods. Perhaps 25,000 years ago, Siberians migrated into Beringia. They may have stayed there for 10,000 years during the Last Glacial Maximum, isolated on a 1,000 mile wide grassland of northwestern Siberia and far western Alaska, plus what is now the seafloor beneath the Bering Strait..
On the east, the Cordilleran Ice Sheet covered the mountains along Alaska's coastline and icebergs calved off the edge into the Pacific Ocean. During the Last Glacial Maximum, that ice sheet coalesced with the Laurentide Ice Sheet further inland. The two ice sheets extended from the frozen Arctic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean. A complete barrier of ice is presumed to have blocked humans from moving into the interior of Alaska or the rest of North America.1
The humans isolated in Beringia were not seeking to move in any particular direction in order to escape their climate-based trap in Beringia. Unlike Columbus in 1492, they were not consciously on a journey to discover a new path to the other side of the world. Unlike the crew of the USS Enterprise in modern Star Trek movies, they were not tasked by a government to push the boundary of human knowledge, to "go where no man has gone before."
They were hunters and gatherers, exploring in search of another meal.
People living in Beringia probably adopted a seasonal pattern of moving around, returning each year to sites known to be rich in ripening plants or migrating animals such as caribou. At each campsite, local food resources were soon exhausted. On a regular basis, they packed up their stone and bone tools, furs, and everything else they owned, then set out to find new plants with edible seeds/fruits and more animals such as woolly mammoths that would reduce hunger for the moment.
Old campsites would be re-visited if there were good food sources nearby. Returning to an old site would require less time to gather stones to make a hearth, or small tree trunks to be used as tent poles. Otherwise, everything they owned was carried from place to place, hung from their waists and on their backs/shoulders. One of the first steps in making camp would have been stripping off the sacks made from skins of animals and woven bags made from plant fibers.
There were no permanently-occupied houses, because no location offered a year-round source of food sufficient to feed an entire hunting band. Paleo-Indians were migrants, constantly on the move.
while isolated in Siberia/Beringia, humans hunted woolly mammoths and other animals that grazed on the tundra, grasses, and small trees
Source: PLoS ONE, What Killed the Woolly Mammoth? (Caitlin Sedwick, 2008)
Perhaps 8,000 to 10,000 migrants were isolated in Beringia for 10,000 or so years. They adapted to the cold climate, and survived on the ice-free steppe and tundra that was suitable for hunting and gathering. For centuries, the ice sheets blocked travel to the east.
Humans probably tried to walk across the Cordilleran Ice Sheet and Laurentide Ice Sheet. Adventurous or starving hunters, or those trying to get away from rivals who were threats, might have packed food and traveled a few days deep into the ice sheets. Leaders of hunting bands may have looked for a path through the ice to new territory to avoid conflict with rivals. Spiritual visionaries may have spurred expeditions onto the ice.
The constraints to moving out of Beringia were food and fuel. Where ice covered the soil completely, there were no dwarf birch, willows or other shrubs to provide materials for building any form of shelter. Plants were required as fuel for initial fires that would grow hot enough to ignite the marrow in large mammal bones, the greatest source of energy available for keeping warm.
Bands of earliest Americans could explore east from the shrub tundra onto the ice sheet during the Last Glacial Maximum. They might find shelter from the winds by sleeping in large cracks within the moving ice sheets, but could survive only briefly without plants and animals for resupplying food. Without vegetation for fuel, even melting ice for drinking water would have been a challenge.
For a long time there was nothing to find inland from the ocean's shoreline but ice and more ice. Short explorations on the ice sheet were feasible, but no one returned from a trip into the ice-covered interior of Alaska that lasted longer than the food supply carried by the traveler(s).
the tundra steppe of Beringia provided food for 10,000 or more years, before ancestors of Paleo-Indians in North America migrated past the ice sheets
Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Cold Land Processes Field Experiment Plan
Despite the presumed constraints of crossing ice sheets that offered no food or fuel, the assumption that no one succeeded during the last Glacial Maximum may have to be reconsidered. In 2017, scientists published details of the discovery of a site in the northwestern Yukon of Canada where humans had lived 24,000 years ago.
They may have migrated there before the ice sheets spread to their greatest extent 26,000 years ago at the Last Glacial Maximum. At that point, the ice blocked passage further south, but somehow those first North American residents reached the Bluefish Caves in Yukon Territory before the Laurentide Ice Sheet retreated.2
ice sheets blocked early North Americans from moving south from Beringia primarily because there was no food for hunter/gatherers
Source: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), NASA Data Peers into Greenland's Ice Sheet
The climate grew warmer at the end of the Ice Age, and land once covered by the ice sheets was exposed. An ice-free corridor opened up first along the edge of the Pacific Ocean. Of the oringinal immigrants from Siberia that were stranded in Beringea, a "founder group" of 1,000-5,400 individuals could have reached California by walking along the western edge of the melting Cordilleran Ice Sheet.
17,000 years ago, sea levels were nearly 400 feet lower than today. The shoreline along which the Paleo-Indians walked was 50-75 miles further west than the modern land-water edge. Many of the original campsites of those immigrants are deep underneath the surface of the Pacific Ocean, but parts of the ancient British Columbia shoreline has "bounded back" as glaciers retreated. Discovery and research into sites there could provide evidence of the migration.3
when migrants reached Triquet Island 14,000 years ago, sea levels were lower and the shoreline was 50-75 miles further west
Source: ESRI, ArcGIS Online
If the first humans to move south from Beringia used the shoreline route, they ate seafood on their journey. Humans reached Triquet Island 14,000 years ago and occupied Monte Verde in Chile 14,500 years ago.4
It is possible that the sites occupied on Triquet Island and Monte Verde were not at the beginning of the immigration. By some route not yet identified, people had already moved inland from the Pacific coast. Evidence at Cactus Hill, along the Nottoway River in Virginia, suggests that site was occupied by Paleo-Indians as long as 18-20,000 years ago. People lived in what is now called the Meadowcroft Rockshelter in western Pennsylvania between 16,000 and 14,000 years ago.5
The eastern edge of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet and the western edge of the Laurentide Ice Sheet finally melted roughly 13,000 years ago (BP, for "Before Present"). A gap between the two ice sheets opened up an inland route south, after enough ice retreated to open land between the ice sheet and meltwater lakes and plants grew on that land.
The gap between the western edge of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet and the eastern edge of the Laurentide Ice Sheet developed after the initial migration into what today is the continental United States. The Clovis culture evolved 2,000 or more years later, after the initial occupation of North America.6
There is an alternative possibility to the Siberians-migrated-via-Beringia hypothesis. In addition to the migrants from Asia, some of the first people in North America could have arrived from Europe by boat, moving along the Atlantic Ocean coastline and hunting marine mammals at the edge of the ice.
The Clovis points found in some of the earliest archeological sites in North America, and perhaps the point dredged up together with mammoth remains from the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean off the Eastern Shore, might be consistent with the theory that North America was settled by people from the Solutré region in France. There is even the possibility that some humans reached California 130,000 years ago, based on one set of mastodon bones with fractures that may have been caused by tools.7
The isolation of Paleo-Indians traveling in separate family groups would have been mitigated somewhat by "man's best friend." Dogs had migrated together with humans across the Beringia land bridge. Most likely, the first dogs in Virginia served as domesticated pets as well as hunting companions.8
Paleo-Indians brought dogs to Virginia, and they may have hunted in packs like wolves
Source: National Park Service, Mollies Pack Wolves Baiting a Bison
The first humans to settle in Virginia, the Paleo-Indians who immigrated here roughly 15,000 years ago, were hunters and gatherers. They traveled widely in family-based groups, acquiring food in various places and then moving to new places when local resources were exhausted.
They could have crossed the North American continent initially as fast-moving hunters, migrating steadily into unexplored country to seek out prey. In the "technology oriented" model postulated by scholars of the Paleo-Indian Period, the technology of Clovis points and the availability of large mammals could have resulted in consistently successful hunts. Few delays may have been required for choosing where to go, or resupplying in case the next territory offered poor hunting.
Alternatively, the "staging area" model postulates a sequential series of migrations, intermixed with occupation of selected areas for longer periods of time. The Ohio, Tennessee, and Cumberland rivers could have provided such attractive places to live that Paleo-Indians chose to continue to hunt and gather in those valleys for one or more generations, rather than keep moving across the mountain ridges to occupy more virgin territory and ultimately reach Virginia.
Pauses would have allowed for cultural change by different groups in different places, which would be documented by variations in the styles of Clovis points in different staging areas. Archeologists find some differences, particularly in the techniques of shaping the base of the point where it was atttached ("hafted") to the spear. How one chooses to interpret those differences, and whether the data supports the "technology oriented" model or "staging area" model, shapes conclusions on how fast the Paleo-Indians moved from Beringea to Virginia.9
Assuming Paleo-Indians slept in shelters made from fiber mats or skins, they had to haul their roofing materials by hand whenever they moved or manufacture new shelters wherever they stopped. Natural shelters would have been very limited. Traveling bands may have set up temporary camps with a natural wooden roof, after finding places where windstorms had knocked down enough trees to create dry spots for a few individuals. Some Virginia caves and rock overhangs were used, but groups that occupied the land east of the Blue Ridge found few such sites.10
The lives of each band, and the prestige and marriage potential of each hunter, depended the effectiveness and efficiency of each hunting and gathering expedition. During the initial migration into North America, there may have been a constant process of experimentation. Food gathering and cooking techniques, spiritual beliefs, and a wide range of behaviors must have changed as the new continent was explored for the first time, but speculation is required to understand their lifestyles. Only stone artifacts have survived to reveal the ancient cultural adaptations to different environments.
Hunters crafted points from bone, shell, antler, and wood as well as different types of stone. The Atlantic Ocean shoreline was 40 miles further east of its current location when Paleo-Indians first arrived. Though the rich supplies of seafood must have provided a strong reason for staying near the coast once people first arrived there, the eastern edge of the Coastal Plain was far from the source materials of the Blue Ridge or Piedmont. There were probably cobbles in the paleo-channels of the Susquehanna and James rivers, but few rock outcrops to supply stone for spear tips or for the knives used to cut skins and fibers.
The Paleo-Indians must have tried making points with different shapes and types of edges as they encountered new plants and animals to convert into food and clothing. The evolution of points demonstrates that people tried to improve upon existing tools to be more successful when hunting different types of animals, and changing forms and materials used for knives/scrapers/awls suggest shifts in population.
Clovis Points, with distinctive "flute" of stone chipped out of the center at the base
Source: National Park Service, Southeastern Prehistory - Paleoindian Period
One of the oldest point designs, the "Clovis" point, is common in Paleo-Indian sites across North America. The namesake discovery site is the town of Clovis in New Mexico, but Clovis points are found in some of the oldest archeological sites in Virginia.
Most archeologists believe Paleo-Indians migrated first into the western side of North America, but the greatest concentration of Clovis points is on the eastern side of North America. There are no precursors to the Clovis point in Siberia or Alaska. That design appears to have been developed in North America, and was in use for 300-400 years. It could have started east of the Mississippi River, and through cultural diffusion spread westward to the Pacific Ocean.11
The Clovis point has a distinctive groove or "flute" in the center. The first people to make a Clovis point might have done so by accident, followed by trial-and-error, followed by intentional shaping of the stone to create the fluted point.
Removing stone from the middle of the point could be viewed as weakening it. A weaker point would crack easier, forcing the band to spend time finding a new quarry site to manufacture more replacements. Time spent replacing points would cut into the time available for collecting food. Making a less-reliable point would be counter-productive.
Clovis points were also harder to manufacture. Each point required about 30 minutes to make by "knapping" stone using pressure to peel off flakes. Near the end of the process, 10-20% of points were ruined when removing slices of stone to create the groove. Nonetheless, Paleo-Indians continued making Clovis points for 300-400 years. The shape had to offer some advantages, to be worth the extra effort required in the manufacturing process.
One obvious advantage of the groove is that it reduced the weight of the point, allowing a hunter to throw a spear farther/faster. The shape also may have reduced aerodynamic drag.
Testing has revealed a third advantage. The groove causes the point to crush near the base unpon a hard impact, but protects the point from cracking in the middle. A Clovis point that hit hard bone in an animal could be reworked easily into a shorter, but still fully serviceable tip for a spear. An archeologist who identified the "shock absorber" advantage of the groove noted:12
immigrants first migrated into the interior of North America along the Pacific shoreline (red arrow), and later through a gap between ice sheets (green arrow)
Source: PLoS ONE, A Three-Stage Colonization Model for the Peopling of the Americas (by Andrew Kitchen, Michael M. Miyamoto, Connie J. Mulligan, 2008)
Spears tipped with Clovis points were useful in hunting large wild animals throughout North America. The initial developers of the Clovis point held no patent, and Paleo-Indian technology was widely imitated as hunters and gatherers ranged across fields and forests throughout that part of North America not covered by the Laurentide Ice Sheet.
Clovis and other point styles from the Paleo Period
Source: National Park Service, Terminal Paleoindian Occupations in the Southeast (10,800-10,000 rcbp, ca. 12,900-11,450 B.P.)
Because we find essentially the same style of point in many different locations, it appears that bands of people traveled widely and interacted with each other regularly. Archeologists recognize differences between types of fluted points crafted in different places over the three-four centuries that the Clovis design was popular.
The rapid adoption of the Clovis point design would not have been possible if Paleo-Indian groups lived in isolation from each other by separate languages or hostile behavior. There must have been physical and cultural barriers, but at least in the Clovis period they were not high enough to cause separate, independent technologies to be restricted to certain locations.
Some caches of unused and unusually large Clovis points appear to be ceremonial stones rather than functional spearpoints. The spread of the design may reflect the rapid spread of a spiritual belief among different groups, rather than adoption of a particular shape because it was more effective in killing mastodons.13
As one author noted:14
Archeologists have identified specific quarry sites from which Paleo-Indians extracted stone to make tools such as Clovis points. For thousands of years, groups regularly visited the jasper outcrop near Flint Run, on the South Fork of the Shenandoah River in Warren County. The quality of that stone for manufacturing replacement points, knives, scrapers, and other stone tools for another season of hunting and gathering was work the trip.
It appears some people even stayed there. The oldest known structure in Virginia - perhaps a house, perhaps a tool-making factory - was found at the Thunderbird site designated as 44WR11. Dr. William Gardner and his wife Dr. Joan Walker excavated the site for 15 years, starting in 1971. The National Park Service designated the Thunderbird Archeological District as a National Historic Landmark in 1977.
Close examination of a point discovered at Thunderbird showed evidence that it had been used on some form of cat, perhaps a saber-toothed tiger. Points found at the nearby Fifty Site showed evidence of rabbit and bear. Paleo-Indians in Virginia hunted far more species than just mastodons.15
Thunderbird is the only identified Paleo-Indian site where public visits have been encouraged. For several years a museum and archeological park located at the site provided public education, but the museum is gone. The archeological site is now subdivided and surrounded by modern houses. After excavations were completed, four lots were purchased by Archeological Society of Virginia and are the only part of the 1,800-acre site now protected by easement.16
the Paleo-Indian Thunderbird quarry is located on the South Fork of the Shenandoah River
Map Source: US Fish and Wildlife Service, Wetlands Mapper
Paleo-Indians in Virginia developed other quarries besides those at Thunderbird. The chert outcrop at the Williamson site in Dinwiddie County supplied "Cattail Creek Chalcedony" for the bands hunting in what is now southern Virginia.
The jasper outcrop at Brook Run in Culpeper County may have been discovered and utilized by Paleo-Indians as well. We find evidence from just later periods at that site, but the evidence of the first users of that stone may have been destroyed by the continued extensive quarrying in the Archaic Period.17
Paleo-Indians developed "point" designs other than Clovis. Shafts and handles were made from bone and wood, so only the points of weapons used for hunting and for fighting other people have survived for later discovery by archeologists.
18,000 years ago at the Last Glacial Maximum, the edge of the Laurentide Ice Sheet was at least 150 miles north of the Potomac River and deciduous forests thrived in Virginia
Source: ESRI, ArcGIS Online
Each hunter may have made some sort of fiber/skin basket or backpack to carry their gear from campsite to campsite, before lightening the load and carrying only selected weapons for an actual hunt. They may have worn a wristband with a part of an antler attached, which they used to re-sharpen a knife or point by quick percussion strokes.
Paleo-Indian camping gear would have included specialized stone tools, used for specific purposes. They carried spearpoints to kill animals, knives to cut a carcass into chunks that could be carried back to camp, scrapers to separate flesh from skin to make clothing, and awls to drill holes in skins before sewing pieces together.
The stone/shell/bone/wood tools would have been wrapped in fiber/skin "wallets" or sacks, in part to leave the traveler's hands free but also to prevent damage to the sharp edges of the tools. People packed carefully, though lightly, to avoid damaging their stone tools during transport.
Paleo-Indians could chip off a stone flake for one-time use in just seconds, but it took precious time to create a sharp edge on a specialized tool. The first people in North America spent the majority of their time, perhaps 80%, hunting and gathering their next meal. Points were re-sharpened as needed, and new tools were made constantly as wear and tear blunted edges. By one estimate, a family group used roughly 100 pounds of stone annually.18
"Food security" was low, so ecological sensitivity was high. Paleo-Indians were skilled geologists as well as skilled wildlife biologists, botanists, meteorologists, etc. They were able to distinguish the high-quality lithic materials of cryptocrystalline stone (jasper, chert, chalcedony, and other silica-rich rocks), forms of quartz that chipped easily and held a sharp edge longer.19
Some stone was acquired from specialized quarry sites, including the Thunderbird Quarry on Flint Run near Front Royal. Often, tools were manufactured from whatever was available when it was needed during seasonal travels into different habitats. For simple tasks, perhaps slicing up a carcass for a meal, a rock could be found, shaped, used, and discarded. Only the specialized tools, made from preferred rock types, were worth carrying around from place to place.
excavations at a former sand-mining site at Cactus Hill (Sussex County) documented that the first people in Virginia arrived before Clovis technology developed
Source: Center for the Study of the First Americans
18,000 years ago, Virginia was far from the edge of the ice sheet. There was vegetation everywhere, providing food for wildlife and the newest species to arrive. The landscape was not comparable to the modern Husdon Bay area, abd there was no cold treeless tundra stretching to the ocean.
Hunting bands killed moose, elk, caribou, bison, and deer in the open grasslands created by lightning and mixed woodlands with patches of spruce, fir, and deciduous trees. Wild game may have been limited on the wind-swept mountaintops or mountain slopes with just a few scattered trees, but river valleys in Virginia were filled with pines and deciduous trees at the end of the Ice Age.
In Northern Virginia, where hills provided shelter from the cold and dry winds blowing off the ice sheet, chestnut, oak and hickory trees produced an annual supply of nuts that fed both wildlife and humans. Further south, the percentage of fir, spruce, and pine trees in the forest was lower. Deciduous forests covered the landscape, including a Coastal Plain 40 miles wider than today.
Paleo-Indians discovered habitats in Virginia that included open grasslands and forests with a mixture of spruce, fir, pines, and deciduous trees
Source: The State Museum of Pennsylvania, Archaeology, Paleo-Indian Diorama
Virginia's first hunters probably spent much of their time in the river valleys and lowlands such as the Shenandoah Valley, where the diversity of habitat offered opportunity to hunt rabbits, birds, and other small game. Constant movement enabled the Paleo-Indians to find new herds of large (and small) mammals, as well as to gather some wild seeds and fruits.
They also hunted or scavenged mastodon that had managed to remain in Virginia as the climate changed. What could be a tool manufactured from the tibia bone of a musk ox has been excavated at Saltville, from a site where a single mastodon may have been butchered and burned 15,000 years ago.20
There is one other mastodon excavation site in Virginia, near Yorktown. Bones there were preserved from decay in the acid Virginia soil because the animal died on a bed of oyster shells where the pH was higher, in a layer of sediments that geologists later named the Yorktown Formation. Radiocarbon dates indicate the animal died over 16,000 years ago.
Killing a mastodon must have provided an immense amount of food, perhaps more than one band of hunters/gatherers could consume before it spoiled. Almost all of the arm and leg bones at the Yorktown site are missing. Marks on remaining bones may be cuts from stone knives as the rest of the meat was removed. Those early Virginians may have butchered the mammoth and carried away the choice parts, leaving much of the meat behind.21
Elsewhere in the Southeast, it is clear that Paleo-Indians hunted large game before the Clovis point was developed. Between 11,000 and 13,000BCE, they butchered a mastodon on the edge of a pond at the Coats-Hines archaeological site south of Nashville, Tennessee. There is also clear archeological evidence that humans killed a mastodon 14,550 years ago at the Page-Ladson site on the Aucilla River in Florida. That was roughly 1,500 years before the Clovis point was developed, and 2,000 years before mastodons went extinct in the area.22
hunting party killing a mastodon, perhaps for ritual more than meat
Source: National Park Service, "The Earliest Americans Theme Study - Northeast Property Types," Paleo Time Period
The stereotype of the first Virginians being big-game hunters, traveling great distances in small hunting parties and spearing mammoths/mastodons for a meal every week, may be completely inappropriate for Virginia and even elsewhere in North America. Because the Clovis points were large, there was assumption that it was used to hunt large mammals. The Big Game Hunting hypothesis has now been supplanted by an assumption that:23
Killing a mastodon may have required separate family groups to unite in the effort, and there were easier sources of food that exposed hunter-gatherers to lower risks. A megafauna kill could have been a rare ceremonial event with great social and symbolic significance rather than just a routine hunting exercise. If mastodons in Virginia were not hunted primarily for food, one possibility is:24
The Paleo-Indians interacted with other family groups, traveling great distances to obtain food. It is unlikely that different groups had well-defined hunting/gathering territories. Similar to modern humans, Paleo-Indians were social animals seeking the company of others for trade, marriage partners, and entertainment.
based on where Clovis points have been found, that shape may have been developed initially in eastern North America and spread westward by cultural diffusion
Source: Paleoindian Database of the Americas, Maps - Entire Database Sample
Population levels were low, based on the small number of artifacts recovered from the Paleo-Indian Period compared to the later Archaic Period. Less than 100 Paleo-Indian sites have been located in Virginia.
During the Paleo-Indian Period within Virginia, different small family units with shared family connections may have gathered into microbands of about 25 people. For special hunts of large game, microbands may have gathered into two to eight large macrobands with 175-475 people each. The total population of Virginia may have been 250-500 people at 8,900BCE, growing to 725-1,450 people at the end of the Paleo-Indian Period around 8,000BCE.25
Microbands did not roam at random, looking for food. Some may have engaged in a seasonal round, seeking food in certain places at roughly the same time each year.
Paleo-Indians moved constantly to find new food resources, but bands returned to some places seasonally or to quarry new stone for their toolkit
Source: Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Paleoindian Period
At least some demonstrated "tethered nomadism." Microbands or family units came back to a few, highly-preferred quarry sites whenever their toolkit was depleted. Such return visits might occur at any time of the year.
After quarrying more flint and jasper, they would pause long enough at a site nearby to make a new set of points, knives, awls, scrapers, etc. Worn-out tools could then be discarded at the site where new tools were manufactured. When enough stone knapping had been completed, the local food resources exhausted, or rivals appeared to conduct their own resupply operation, the microband or family group would return to its pattern of hunting and gathering.
It is clear that Paleo-Indians regularly excavated at Flint Run and Williamson quarries to extract their preferred cryptocrystalline stone. The quarries were rare sources of chalcedony, chert, and jasper, forms of silica like quartz, that made sharp edges when shaped skillfully through percussion (hammering to crack off large pieces) and pressure (to remove smaller, specific flakes). There is evidence that 20 different groups used separate spots at Flint Run for collecting and processing the stone to restock their tool kit.26
Each Paleo-Indian band included roughly 25 members. Groups who lived together were based on close family connections; only later would different families share the same space and develop into tribal groups.
The initial interactions between bands of strangers armed with spears and razor-sharp stone knives must have been stressful, but the need to find mates outside the family would have spurred regular social interaction. When groups met, it is reasonable to assume they traded information and also special objects, such as shiny shells and stones preferred for making tools. The "first date" between adolescents in other hunting bands would have been followed by a quick decision to select a mate, before the bands traveled in different directions for perhaps another year.
The roaming macro-bands (groups larger than single families, but not organized into tribes independent of family kinship) may have used gaps through the Blue Ridge as the geographic locators of where to meet. Groups roaming through the valleys west of the Blue Ridge might make repeated visits to the eastern edge of the mountains, or groups roaming on the Piedmont might push westward through a wind/water gap to meet other macro-bands.
Paleo-Indians may have used gaps in the Blue Ridge as easy-to-recognize locations for meeting with other traveling bands
Source: Global Land One-km Base Elevation Project (GLOBE), State Topography Image: Virginia
Former Fairfax County Archeologist Mike Johnson has suggested that Paleo-Indians may have used Smith Mountain Gap (Pittsylvania County) and Thoroughfare Gap (Prince William County) to specify "meet-up" sites. On some pre-arranged date, perhaps defined by cycles of the moon, separate bands would gather for a few days to trade, socialize, and find new partners. Negotiations had to be concluded before local food supplies were exhausted and the bands set off in different directions, after arranging the time and place for a future rendezvous.
Some of the oldest human-created artifacts in Virginia have been revealed at excavations at the eastern edge of Smith Mountain Gap, on the eroding shoreline of the pumped storage hydropower reservoir between Smith Mountain Dam and Leesville Dam. That location provided an easy-to-identify slot in the Blue Ridge, recognizable from as far as 30 miles away on the eastern side. Before the Roanoke River was dammed, anadromous fish such as Atlantic salmon would have swum far upstream, providing an extra food source for a rendezvous there in May/June.
Paleo-Indians returned to sites on the Roanoke River, later inundated by Leesville Lake
Source: Virginia Department of Historic Resources, Archaeological Assessment of Sites 44PY7, 44PY43, and 44PY152 at Leesville Lake, Pittsylvania County, Virginia (Figure 9)
Travelers from the east could have brought brightly-colored shells from the Atlantic Ocean, located 40 miles further east from the current shoreline. During the Ice Age, sealskins were readily available at the latitude of modern Virginia. Ocean-based items would have been especially valued by Paleo-Indians living west of the Blue Ridge.
Travelers from the west could have brought trade items from the Mississippi River valley, via the Kanawha River connection to the Ohio River. Perhaps the item of greatest interest would have been different forms of stone valued for utility (after being worked into tools) or for other cultural reasons. Paoli chert from the Big Sandy River drainage in Kentucky has been identified at Leesville Lake; Paleo-Indians transported it there for a reason.27
Smith Mountain Gap offered a meeting spot in Paleo-Indian times for travelers from moving east up the Kanawha/New rivers (in purple) and west up the Roanoke River (in red) to trade sealskins, seashells, and unique forms of stone
Source: ESRI, ArcGIS Online
The predictive model allows archeologists to target specific sites for research, rather than rely upon chance discovery. Specific criteria entered into a Geographic Information System (GIS) can suggest where, 10-15,000 years ago, traveling bands of hunters would have said "let's meet there, to trade and party" at a particular time of year.
Even without GIS technology or archeological expertise, it is possible to recognize distinctive locations. For example, a sandstone outcrop offering a spectacular view from the west side of the Blue Ridge near the Loudoun/Clarke county line known as Bears Den may have been a gathering point.
Paleo-Indians may have walked from the Shenandoah River to Bears Den, following the topography the way Route 7 does today
Source: US Fish and Wildlife Service, Wetlands Mapper
The first Virginians moved often through the course of a year. Groups living near a source of stone for their tools (Paleo-Indian quarries) may have traveled less than groups living on the Coastal Plain, where there were fewer rocks that were easy to fracture into tools that held their sharp edges. Paleo-Indians in Virginia probably:28
On Spout Run near the Shenandoah River in Clark County, an archeologist has claimed that a series of concentric stone circles (designated site 44CK151) could be a 12,000-year old observatory. Jack Hranicky hypothesized that Paleo-Indians, after quarrying jasper for tools at Thunderbird, walked down the Shenandoah River and held some sort of cultural ceremonies at the Spout Run site.
Petroglyphs in the shape of foot prints could be intended to mark where to stand in order to observe an equinox - or the arrangement of the rocks could also be natural, with alignments created by just gravity and erosion over time. If it was built in the Paleo-Indian period to mark the summer/winter solstices and fall/spring equinoxes, the Spout Run site is unique.
Modern scholars have identified only one other possible solar observatory in Virginia. Hand glyphs in a rock shelter at Little Mountain in Nottoway County are illuminated by sunlight only around the winter solstice. The relationship between sunlight and that rock art, painted much later in the Woodland Period, may be just coincidental.
It woud always be a challenge the accept that humans arranged the rocks at Spout Run over 10,000 years ago to create a solar observatory, but constructed at most one other calendar site in all the remaining time before European colonization.
Perhaps there are more prehistoric calendar sites in Virginia. They could have been disrupted by farmers who occupied the lands in the 1600's and 1700's, or pehaps modern archeologists have just failed to see the evidence. There is no reason to assume that cultural changes at the end of the Paleo-Indian period included the loss of astronomical understanding.29
The end of the Paleo-Indian period, and the start of the Archaic period, is marked by new designs of points. The distinctive fluted point, with the flake removed from the center, is replaced by notches on the side. That may reflect a different technique for attaching the point to a wooden shaft.
Around 8,000BCE, human travel and settlement patterns were affected by the emergence of new habitats and new food sources. In Virginia, large mammals such as the mastodon were replaced with deer and other smaller game animals. Deciduous forests replaced open grasslands, offering nutritious hickory nuts and even acorns. Estuaries on the Coastal Plain stabilized, followed by an increase on accessible oysters, clams, and crabs. Anadromous fish swam up river valleys to the Fall Line, offering yet another source of protein and fat.
Changing habitats may have encouraged foraging in more areas, expanding the number of ridgetops and valleys visited by hunting and gathering parties. as people moved into areas formerly unoccupied, family groups may have become more isolated. Interaction between groups may have been blocked by evolving religious or political barriers, and the emergence of separate languages.
Finding different designs in different locations that were occupied at the same time period suggests that the occupants of those two places were isolated by physical or cultural barriers, allowing time for flintknappers in different groups to evolve separate styles. Acess to the Thunderbird quarry may have been limited by new boundaries between foraging groups that emerged about 10,000 years ago.
That constraint could have spurred a hunting band to use chert from Back Creek, north of modern-day Winchester. A workshop location where chert was reduced to cores and some finished points, later labeled the Fout Site, was destroyed when the Virginia Department of Transportation expanded US 522. The site was excavated by archeologists before the highway bridge over the creek was built, though the information from the 1969 dig was not finally published until 1996.30
Fout Site (44 FX 3), a chert quarry workshop
first used in Early Archaic Period
Map Source: US Geological Survey, National Map
The presence of a significantly new stone tool or pottery design in a location could also suggest human migration. New designs may appear quickly, without gradual changes in the preceding design, when a place is occupied by a new group. Immigrants bring new cultural patterns.
By tracing the locations of archeological sites with a specific design, it is possible to show the migration paths of the past. In the Paleo-Indian Period, groups interacted often enough to have a standard way of making Clovis, Dalton, and Cumberland points across all of Virginia.
In the Archaic Period, the Native American population expanded. Greater diversity in point styles suggests that boundaries between different groups of people became more firm, limiting long-distance travel of individual hunting/gathering bands. New points were smaller and had many with notches on the corner, where sinew and plant fibers were wrapped to attach the point to a smaller spear or an atl-atl projectile.
edge of the Atlantic Continental Shelf,
where first PaleoIndian camps may be located underwater today
(36° 30' is the latitude of the southern border of Virginia)
Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
1. Scott Elias, "Beringia: Lost World of the Ice Age," Alaska Park Science - Climate Change in Alaska's National Parks, Volume 12 Issue 2 (undated), https://www.nps.gov/articles/aps-v12-i2-c8.htm; "Popular theory on how humans populated North America can't be right, study shows," CBC News, August 10, 2016, http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/ice-free-corridor-north-americans-1.3715397; "First Americans lived on land bridge for thousands of years, genetics study suggests," The Conversation, February 28, 2014, http://theconversation.com/first-americans-lived-on-land-bridge-for-thousands-of-years-genetics-study-suggests-23747; "Pause Is Seen in a Continent’s Peopling," New York Times, March 12, 2014, https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/13/science/linguistic-study-sheds-new-light-on-peopling-of-north-america.html; John F. Hoffecker, Scott A. Elias, Dennis H. O'Rourke, "Out of Beringia?," Science, Volume 343 Issue 6174 (February 28, 2014), http://science.sciencemag.org/content/343/6174/979.full; "Emergence of People in North America," Idaho Museum of Natural History, http://imnh.isu.edu/digitalatlas/geog/native/text/history.htm (last checked January 14, 2017)
2. Lauriane Bourgeon, Ariane Burke, Thomas Higham, "Earliest Human Presence in North America Dated to the Last Glacial Maximum: New Radiocarbon Dates from Bluefish Caves, Canada," PLOS One, January 6, 2017, http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169486; "Archaeological Find Puts Humans in North America 10,000 Years Earlier Than Thought," Hakai Magazine, January 13, 2017, https://www.hakaimagazine.com/article-short/archaeological-find-puts-humans-north-america-10000-years-earlier-thought; "What Happens When an Archaeologist Challenges Mainstream Scientific Thinking?," Smithsonian, March 8, 2017, http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/jacques-cinq-mars-bluefish-caves-scientific-progress-180962410/; "A Sunken Bridge the Size of a Continent," Hakai Magazine, September 20, 2016, https://www.hakaimagazine.com/article-long/sunken-bridge-size-continent; Peter U. Clark, Arthur S. Dyke, Jeremy D. Shakun, Anders E. Carlson, Jorie Clark, Barbara Wohlfarth, Jerry X. Mitrovica, Steven W. Hostetler, A. Marshall McCabe, "The Last Glacial Maximum," Science, Volume 325, Issue 5941 (August 7, 2009), https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172873 (last checked August 10, 2017)
3. "Most archaeologists think the first Americans arrived by boat. Now, they’re beginning to prove it," Science, August 10, 2017, http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/08/most-archaeologists-think-first-americans-arrived-boat-now-they-re-beginning-prove-it; Daniel S. Amick, "Evolving views on the Pleistocene colonization of North America," Quaternary International, Volume 431, Part B (February 28, 2017), p.127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.030 (last checked August 29, 2017)
4. "Village site on Triquet Island proves to be ancient history," Times Colonist, April 16, 2017, http://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/village-site-on-triquet-island-proves-to-be-ancient-history-1.15548137 (last checked August 10, 2017)
5. Michael F. Johnson, "Cactus Hill Archaeological Site," Encyclopedia Virginia, Virginia Foundation for the Humanities, October 5, 2016, https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Cactus_Hill_Archaeological_Site; Albert C. Goodyear, "Evidence of Pre-Clovis Sites in the Eastern United States," Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis, 2005, pp.103-107, http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=sciaa_staffpub (last checked August 10, 2017)
6. Nicole Misartia, Bruce P. Finney, James W. Jordan, Herbert D.G. Maschner, Jason A. Addison, Mark D. Shapley, Andrea Krumhardt, James E. Beget, "Early retreat of the Alaska Peninsula Glacier Complex and the implications for coastal migrations of First Americans," Quaternary Science Reviews, Volume 48 (August 10, 2012), http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379112002016; John F. Hoffecker, Scott A. Elias, Dennis H. O'Rourke, "Out of Beringia?," Science, Vol. 343 no. 6174 (February 28, 2014), http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250768; Mikkel W. Pedersen, Anthony Ruter, Charles Schweger, Harvey Friebe, Richard A. Staff, Kristian K. Kjeldsen, Marie L. Z. Mendoza, Alwynne B. Beaudoin, Cynthia Zutter, Nicolaj K. Larsen, Ben A. Potter, Rasmus Nielsen, Rebecca A. Rainville, Ludovic Orlando, David J. Meltzer, Kurt H. Kjær, Eske Willerslev, "Postglacial viability and colonization in North America’s ice-free corridor," Nature, Vol.537, p.48, September 1 2016, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v537/n7618/full/nature19085.html; "Meadowcroft Rockshelter," Simon Fraser University Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, http://www.sfu.museum/journey/an-en/postsecondaire-postsecondary/meadowcroft; "Found: One of the Oldest North American Settlements," Smithsonian, April 5, 2017, http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/one-oldest-north-american-settlements-found-180962750/ (last checked April 7, 2017)
7. Bruce Bradley and Dennis Stanford, "The North Atlantic Ice-Edge Corridor: A Possible Palaeolithic Route to the New World," World Archaeology, Vol. 36, No. 4 (December 2004), http://www.jstor.org/stable/4128281; "A 130,000-Year-Old Mastodon Threatens to Upend Human History," Wired, April 26, 2017, https://www.wired.com/2017/04/130000-year-old-mastodon-threatens-upend-human-history (last checked April 28, 2017)
8. Guo-Dong Wang, Weiwei Zhai, He-Chuan Yang, Lu Wang, Li Zhong, Yan-Hu Liu, Ruo-Xi Fan, Ting-Ting Yin, Chun-Ling Zhu, Andrei D Poyarkov, David M Irwin, Marjo K Hytönen, Hannes Lohi, Chung-I Wu, Peter Savolainen, and Ya-Ping Zhang, "Out of southern East Asia: the natural history of domestic dogs across the world," Cell, Volume 26 Number 1 (January 2016), https://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2Fcr.2015.147, "Some Surprising Dog Breeds Have Ancient American Heritage," New York Times, April 25, 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/25/science/dogs-dna-ancestry.html (last checked April 26, 2017)
9. Ashley M. Smallwood, American Antiquity, Volume 77, Number 4 (October 2012), p.691, p.707, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23486485 (last checked September 6, 2017)
10. Michael B. Barber, David A. Hubbard, Jr., "Overview of the Use of Caves in Virginia: A 10,500 Year History," Journal of Cave and Karst Studies Vol.59, No.3, p.132, http://www.caves.org/pub/journal/PDF/V59/V59N3-Barber.pdf (last checked July 4, 2012)
11. "The Clovis Point and the Discovery of America’s First Culture," Smithsonian, November 2013, http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-clovis-point-and-the-discovery-of-americas-first-culture-3825828/ (last checked August 8, 2017)
12. "Archaeologist explains innovation of 'fluting' ancient stone weaponry," phys.org, April 4, 2017, https://phys.org/news/2017-04-archaeologist-fluting-ancient-stone-weaponry.html; Kaitlyn A. Thomas, Brett A. Story, Metin I. Eren, Briggs Buchanan, Brian N. Andrews, Michael J. O'Brien, David J. Meltzer, "Explaining the origin of fluting in North American Pleistocene weaponry," Journal of Archaeological Science, Volume 81 (May 2017), p.24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.03.004 (last checked August 2, 2017)
13. J. David Kilby, "An investigation of Clovis caches: Content, function, and technological organization," PhD dissertation, The University of New Mexico, 2008, http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=1606882861&Fmt=7&clientI d=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD (last checked July 3, 2012)
14. David Reich et al., "Reconstructing Native American population history," Nature, July 11, 2012, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v488/n7411/full/nature11258.html (last checked July 12, 2012)
15. "The Earliest Americans Theme Study," National Park Service, http://www.nps.gov/archeology/pubs/nhleam/F-Southeast.htm (last checked July 6, 2013)
16. Sandra D. Speiden, "ASV Undertakes rescue of Thunderbird Paleoindian Site," Quarterly Bulletin, Archeological Society of Virginia, Vol. 47 No. 2 (June 1992), p. 104; "Thunderbird Archeological District ," National Park Service, National Historic Landmarks Program, http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1736&ResourceType=District (last checked July 6, 2013)
17. G. William Monaghana, Daniel R. Hayes, S.I. Dworkin, Eric Voigt, "Geoarchaeology of the Brook Run site (44CU122): an Early Archaic jasper quarry in Virginia, USA," Journal of Archaeological Science Vol. 31 Issue 8 (2004), pp.1086-1087
18. Gardner, William M., "An Examination of Cultural Change in the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene (circa 9200 to 6800 B.C.)," in Paleoindian Research in Virginia: A Synthesis, edited by J. Mark Wittkofski and Theodore R. Reinhart, pp. 5-52. Archaeological Society of Virginia Special Publication 19: Barbara E. Luedtke, "Quarrying And Quantification: Estimates Of Lithic Material Demand," Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 4, No. 2 (1979), pp. 261, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20707841; William Jack Hranicky, Lithic Technology in the Middle Potomac River Valley of Maryland and Virginia, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012, p.58, https://books.google.com/books?id=jIzlBwAAQBAJ (last checked August 8, 2017)
19. William Jack Hranicky, "Lithic Distribution for Paleopoints in Virginia," Quarterly Bulletin, Archeological Society of Virginia, Volume 64, Number 2 (June 2009), p.49, http://www.archeologyva.org/Pub/asvcat/quarbul.html (last checked Augusy 8, 2017)
20. Clayton E. Ray, Byron N. Cooper and William S. Benninghoff, "Fossil Mammals and Pollen in a Late Pleistocene Deposit at Saltville, Virginia," Journal of Paleontology, Vol. 41, No. 3 (May, 1967), http://www.jstor.org/stable/1302045; Charles O. Handley Jr., "Terrestrial Mammals of Virginia: Trends in Distribution and Diversity," Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 43 No. 1B (Spring 1992), http://www.vacadsci.org/vjsArchives/V43/43-1B/43-157.pdf; Albert C. Goodyear, "Evidence for Pre-Clovis Sites in the Eastern United States," in Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis, Peopling of the Americas Publication, 2006 http://allendale-expedition.net/publications/AL_ORIGN1.PDF; "The Saltville Fossil Site in Virginia," GeorgiaBeforePeople blog, https://markgelbart.wordpress.com/2013/08/01/the-saltville-fossil-site-in-virginia/ (last checked August 10, 2017)
21. "Mastodon Discovery," Virginia Currents, March 30, 2017, http://video.ideastations.org/video/3000012303/; "Rare find: Mastodon bones unearthed in Yorktown," The Virginian-Pilot, July 22, 2015, http://hamptonroads.com/2015/07/rare-find-mastodon-bones-unearthed-yorktown; "Digging up what? It’s a mastodon. And it’s in Virginia," Washington Post, July 20, 2015, https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/digging-up-what-its-a-mastodon-and-its-in-virginia/2015/07/20/860fa748-241f-11e5-b72c-2b7d516e1e0e_story.html?utm_term=.f950f0170324 (last checked August 10, 2017)
22. "Coats-Hines Archaeological Site," National Register of Historic Places Registration Form, Tennessee Historical Commission, December 17, 2010 http://www.tn.gov/environment/hist/pdf/coats_hines_arch_site.pdf; Jessi J. Halligan, Michael R. Waters, Angelina Perrotti, Ivy J. Owens, Joshua M. Feinberg, Mark D. Bourne, Brendan Fenerty, Barbara Winsborough, David Carlson, Daniel C. Fisher, Thomas W. Stafford Jr, James S. Dunbar, "Pre-Clovis occupation 14,550 years ago at the Page-Ladson site, Florida, and the peopling of the Americas," Science Advances, Volume 2, Number 5 (May 6, 2016), http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/5/e1600375 (last checked April 10, 2017)
23. National Park Service, https://www.nps.gov/archeology/pubs/nhleam/f-northeast.htm (last checked August 8, 2017)
24. Speth, J.D., et al., "Early Paleoindian big-game hunting in North America: Provisioning or Politics?," Quaternary International (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2010.10.027 (last checked July 3, 2012)
25. "Windows Into the Past: Archaeological Assessment of Three City Point Lots, City of Hopewell, Virginia," William and Mary Center for Archaeological Research, May 20, 2003, p.9, http://hopewellva.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Windows_Into_the_Past-Report.pdf; E. Randolph Turner III, "Paleoindian Settlement Patterns and Population Distribution in Virginia," in Paleoindian Research in Virginia: A Synthesis, J. Mark Wittkofski, Theodore R. Reinhart (editors), Archeological Society of Virginia Special publication No.19, 1994, pp.85-86, https://books.google.com/books?id=tt3DAAAACAAJ (last checked August 29, 2017)
26. William M. Gardner, "Stop Me If You've Heard This One Before: The Flint Run Paleoindian Complex Revisited," Archaeology of Eastern North America, Volume 11 (Fall 1983), p.56, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40914222; E. Randolph Turner III, "Paleoindian Settlement Patterns and Population Distribution in Virginia," in Paleoindian Research in Virginia: A Synthesis, J. Mark Wittkofski, Theodore R. Reinhart (editors), Archeological Society of Virginia Special publication No.19, 1994, pp.82-83, https://books.google.com/books?id=tt3DAAAACAAJ (last checked August 10, 2017)
27. Mike Johnson, presentation to Northern Virginia Chapter of Archeological Society of Virginia, November 16, 2015; The Datum Point, newsletter of the Northern Virginia Chapter of the Archeological Society Of Virginia, June 2012, p.5, http://www.nvcasv.org/datum/datum.html (last checked May 11, 2014)
28. Robert Hellman, "Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park Cultural Overview," National Park Service, 2003 http://www.nps.gov/seac/SoutheastChronicles/KEMO/KEMO-Cultural-Overview.htm (last checked July 4, 2012)
29. "New Equinox Features Discovered at Clarke County Solstice Site," Clark Daily News, September 21, 2012, http://www.clarkedailynews.com/new-equinox-features-discovered-at-clarke-county-solstice-site/; "Letter to Editor – Archaeologist Responds to Questions about 12,000-year-old Solstice Site," Clark Daily News, October 27, 2011, http://www.clarkedailynews.com/letter-to-editor-archaeologist-responds-to-questions-about-12000-year-old-solstice-site/; "Couple discovers stone circles on property," The Roanoke Times, May 10, 2014, http://www.roanoke.com/news/virginia/couple-discovers-stone-circles-on-property/article_1a74e748-d8b5-11e3-9cfa-0017a43b2370.html; "Paint Lick Mountain Pictograph Archaeological Site," Encyclopedia Virginia, Virginia Foundation for the Humanities, May 30, 2014, https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Paint_Lick_Mountain_Pictograph_Archaeological_Site (last checked August 10, 2017)
30. Howard A. MacCord Sr., "The Fout Site, Frederick County, Virginia,) Quarterly Bulletin, Archeological Survey of Virginia, Vol. 51, No. 1 (March 1996), p. 21